On 11/12/2013 10:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I'm glad to see this hackish stuff go away!
The build changes are mostly fine, however you remove the definition
of BEANLESS_CLASSES_TARGETS but do not remove it everywhere. While it
will work (expands to empty), it would be better if you fixed t
On 2013-12-10 12:06, Alan Bateman wrote:
(This one is for the jdk9-dev forest once it is created)
The addPropertyChangeListener and removePropertyChangeListener methods
defined by Pack200.{Packer,Unpacker} and LogManager methods are
deprecated and flagged with a warning that they "will be rem
Looks good. Happy to see these methods finally removed for a clean jdk
modularization!
Mandy
On 12/10/2013 3:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
(This one is for the jdk9-dev forest once it is created)
The addPropertyChangeListener and removePropertyChangeListener methods
defined by Pack200.{Packer
Hi Alan:
(This one is for the jdk9-dev forest once it is created)
The addPropertyChangeListener and removePropertyChangeListener methods
defined by Pack200.{Packer,Unpacker} and LogManager methods are
deprecated and flagged with a warning that they "will be removed in a
future release". Thi
On 12/10/13 12:06 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
(This one is for the jdk9-dev forest once it is created)
The addPropertyChangeListener and removePropertyChangeListener methods
defined by Pack200.{Packer,Unpacker} and LogManager methods are
deprecated and flagged with a warning that they "will be remo
(This one is for the jdk9-dev forest once it is created)
The addPropertyChangeListener and removePropertyChangeListener methods
defined by Pack200.{Packer,Unpacker} and LogManager methods are
deprecated and flagged with a warning that they "will be removed in a
future release". This is highli
