Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Yes, since no code had changed as suspected the build passed. -Xiomara Phil Race wrote: Roman, > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 so if you d

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Phil, > Roman, > > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory > > The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the > production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 > so if you don't have this file I'd have expected previous builds/drops > to fail

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Phil Race
Roman, > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 so if you don't have this file I'd have expected previous builds/drops to fail for you also. -phil. R

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Hi Roman, The build I was referring to was for the product build. I am working on building the openjdk build and will let you know. -Xiomara Roman Kennke wrote: Hello everybody, with a fresh checkout from the new repositories I get the following compile error, am I missing something here?:

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Kennke
Hello everybody, with a fresh checkout from the new repositories I get the following compile error, am I missing something here?: /usr/bin/gcc -O3-fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses -fno-omit-frame-pointer -D_LITTLE_ENDIAN -D__MEDIALIB_OLD_NAMES -D__USE_J2D_NAM

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Mark Reinhold wrote: Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:11:46 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. In the next few days, all the repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ will be re-initialized, making them unrelated to the previous

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 30/11/2007, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Build 24 and the Mercurial Transition Status: > >* We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. > In the next few days, all the repositories at > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ > will be re-initialized, making them unrel

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-02 Thread Mark Reinhold
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:11:46 -0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >* We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. > In the next few days, all the repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ > will be re-initialized, making them unrelated to the previous > experimental ones.

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Kelly O'Hair wrote: Build 24 and the Mercurial Transition Status: * We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. In the next few days, all the repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ will be re-initialized, making them unrelated to the previous experimental ones. They

Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-11-30 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Build 24 and the Mercurial Transition Status: * We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. In the next few days, all the repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ will be re-initialized, making them unrelated to the previous experimental ones. They will contain the offi