Re: Build Failure on Master

2017-06-17 Thread Alan Bateman
On 17/06/2017 12:39, Claes Redestad wrote: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/ - but it was recently synced to jdk9/dev (as in a few hours ago) and should be effectively the same. With some luck there'll not be much if any difference between them going forward. The changes that were accumul

Re: Build Failure on Master

2017-06-17 Thread Claes Redestad
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/ - but it was recently synced to jdk9/dev (as in a few hours ago) and should be effectively the same. With some luck there'll not be much if any difference between them going forward. /Claes On 2017-06-17 11:17, Pepper Lebeck-Jobe wrote: Thanks Gary. That

Re: Build Failure on Master

2017-06-17 Thread Pepper Lebeck-Jobe
Thanks Gary. That got me unblocked. One more question about the repository layout. If I want to be on the bleeding edge of development for the JPMS (a.k.a Jigsaw) which of these should I be building from? http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/ http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/ http://hg.openj

Build Failure on Master

2017-06-17 Thread Pepper Lebeck-Jobe
I decided to try and figure out where the empty source path regression was coming from, and possibly fix it. See: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-June/012938.html But, when I checked out the sources from mercurial and tried to build them, I ended up getting some errors. Anyo