, 2020 5:51 AM
To: Junyuan Zheng; Magnus Ihse Bursie; build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: macOS build success but codesign fail on
macOS 10.13.5 or older
I couldn't find your name in the census [1] so I assume you need a
sponsor for pushing this?
/Erik
[1]
https://
: macOS build success but codesign fail on macOS
10.13.5 or older
I couldn't find your name in the census [1] so I assume you need a
sponsor for pushing this?
/Erik
[1]
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fopenjdk.java.net%2Fcensus&data=02%7C01%7CJuny
like me to help with backporting this change or anything.
Thanks,
Junyuan
From: Erik Joelsson
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 6:26 AM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie ; Junyuan Zheng
; build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: macOS build success but codesign fail on macOS 10.13.5
or older
build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: macOS build success but codesign fail on macOS 10.13.5
or older
On 2020-02-28 01:04, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2020-02-28 09:59, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> On 2020-02-27 16:07, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-
On 2020-02-28 01:04, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2020-02-28 09:59, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2020-02-27 16:07, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2020-02-27 06:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I don't think it should be a fatal error. If you have a codesign
binary on your path that does not support --op
On 2020-02-28 09:59, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2020-02-27 16:07, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2020-02-27 06:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I don't think it should be a fatal error. If you have a codesign
binary on your path that does not support --option runtime, you
should still be able to build
On 2020-02-27 16:07, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2020-02-27 06:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I don't think it should be a fatal error. If you have a codesign
binary on your path that does not support --option runtime, you
should still be able to build, but not sign. Change it to a warning,
and let
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie ; Junyuan Zheng
; build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: macOS build success but codesign fail on macOS 10.13.5
or older
On 2020-02-27 06:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I don't think it should be a fatal error. If you have a codesign
> bin
On 2020-02-27 06:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I don't think it should be a fatal error. If you have a codesign
binary on your path that does not support --option runtime, you should
still be able to build, but not sign. Change it to a warning, and let
the user continue without CODESIGN.
My i
On 2020-02-26 18:30, Junyuan Zheng wrote:
Hi all,
A recent change in OpenJDK tip
(https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/dcf88e5c8c07) contains a potential bug
when try to sign the macOS binary on older macOS.
The current macOS signing process will execute the following command in order:
1.
This looks good to me. Style wise I would ask you to break the long line
as it makes future side-by-side comparisons and merges annoying.
/Erik
On 2020-02-26 09:30, Junyuan Zheng wrote:
Hi all,
A recent change in OpenJDK tip
(https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/dcf88e5c8c07) contains a p
Hi all,
A recent change in OpenJDK tip
(https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/dcf88e5c8c07) contains a potential bug
when try to sign the macOS binary on older macOS.
The current macOS signing process will execute the following command in order:
1. Checking whether codesign certificate is pre
Hi all,
In an attempt to be the most annoying person on build-dev in June (do you
hand out prizes, because I'm totally winning). I'm now at the "error:
comparison of array 'rasterP->sppsm.offsets' not equal to a null pointer is
always true" bug aka https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8080993
13 matches
Mail list logo
