Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-06-05 Thread Rob Ross
: Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP Well I'm happy to report I finally got the full build to work, although it took another 15 hours or so. The last two big issues I encountered: 1. Unfamiliarity with the freetype project, so had to figure out what needed to be built. This project is rather

RE: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-22 Thread Ted Neward
://www.tedneward.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:build-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ross Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:43 AM To: Kelly O'Hair Cc: build-dev Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP Well I'm happy to report I finally got the full

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-20 Thread Rob Ross
Well I'm happy to report I finally got the full build to work, although it took another 15 hours or so. The last two big issues I encountered: 1. Unfamiliarity with the freetype project, so had to figure out what needed to be built. This project is rather complicated. It supports building

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-20 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Thanks Igor, I'll try and add that information to the OpenJDK Build README. -kto Igor Nekrestyanov wrote: - Freetype is new to many of us, I use a freetype that someone else built so I have never experienced building it myself. I will try and look into this and see if I can

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-20 Thread Kelly O'Hair
I do recall that a large part of the problem is that the Visual Studio compiler uses default filenames that are generic names, so that if GNU make does try and compile two different files, they can end up trying to write to the same file, not good. So it may not be GNU make's fault in all cases,

Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Rob Ross
Hi there everyone. This will officially be my first email to the OpenJDK project. I got to attend a couple of sessions/BOFs at JavaOne2008 about OpenJDK and my interest was piqued. I've been playing with the build for the last week. (A more accurate description would be, yanking my hair

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Rob Ross wrote: Hi there everyone. This will officially be my first email to the OpenJDK project. Welcome. I actually appreciate the email, some comments below. I got to attend a couple of sessions/BOFs at JavaOne2008 about OpenJDK and my interest was piqued. I've been playing with the

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Martin Buchholz
I propose that Sun create an externally-visible tree of binaries in the form that the JDK makefiles expect for ALT_SLASH_JAVA. Then OpenJDK developers could copy this tree to their development machine, set ALT_SLASH_JAVA to this directory, and most of the sanity warnings would evaporate. Of

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Martin, I'd settle for just a *list* of all the tools you need, and have the JDK build able to find all the tools given a minimum of ALT variable settings. For licensing reasons, I suspect Sun cannot redistribute many of the tools, but if the user could populate such a tree, then any

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
I can't see this happening due to the legal re-distribution issues and requirements you'd have on all these different software packages. And I for one would NOT want to be the maintainer of it. Maybe my frustrations with Windows is blinding me to some new good solution to this problem, but

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
I tried to provide that list at: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#windows Did I miss the target somehow? -kto Jonathan Gibbons wrote: Martin, I'd settle for just a *list* of all the tools you need, and have the JDK build able to find all the tools

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
One setting is enough, if the directory structure is right: $ALT_SLASH_JAVA devtools share ant... findbugs... plugin mozilla_headers_18.win32... Windows DXSDK... re jdk 1.6.0/archive/fcs/binaries/windows-i586...

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Kelly, Max, That list mostly covers what you need for a build (Ant does not seem to be present, required by langtools), but it bdoesn't cover everything you may need to work on OpenJDK, and it doesn't particularly encourage a single shared tree. As Max points out, you can get by with a

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
It is a BUILD readme. The development requirements are a separate thing, perhaps that should be documented in the development guide? Yes, we should add ant as a build requirement, I'll fix that. --- Trying to satisfy everyone with the build configurations is frustrating to say the least. If

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
True, and to be fair, the BUILD readme is quite good. Perhaps I'd be happy with a simple short table in the developers guide that at least gives me one place to go to find a list of everything I need, with (references to) info on where to get and how to use those tools. (ie what env variables

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 on Windows XP

2008-05-19 Thread Igor Nekrestyanov
- Freetype is new to many of us, I use a freetype that someone else built so I have never experienced building it myself. I will try and look into this and see if I can document it better. Original way to build freetype on windows is described here: