Hi Christoph,
> On 19 Mar 2021, at 00:00, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
>
> ...
>
> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
> tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
> gmake
>
> ...
>
> 4. CMake is better supported by IDEs like Visual S
Dear Java developers,
thank you for the great discussion!
> Thanks for that extensive explanation! I have nothing to contribute here.
> But would like to thank you guys for the work on the build system. It's
> exceptionally stable and works very well.
You seem to be fine with the build system Jav
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM wrote:
> On 2021-03-19 03:14, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
> tools of IDEs (Visual Stud
On 2021-03-19 03:14, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
gmake
Is gmake re
On 3/19/21 10:14 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
g
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:04 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> >> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
> >> tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
> >> gmake
> >>
> > Is gmake really where we lose ti
Hello
On macmini m1 jdk in default config can be built in about 4 minutes. (make
images)
I might guess autotools aren't the slowest thing.
Regards, Vladimir
Andrew Haley 19 марта 2021 г. 13:04:38 написал:
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
2. More choices to actually build the project: Use
On 3/19/21 9:22 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>> 2. More choices to actually build the project: Use integrated build
>> tools of IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode) or use Ninja, which is faster than
>> gmake
>>
> Is gmake really where we lose time? Did you analyze this or is this just an
> assumption? I would h
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:01 AM Christoph Grüninger
wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> for sure, I am going to do CMake cheerleading.
>
> I think OpenJDK would profit from a change to CMake:
>
> 1. Less tools required for building: CMake + gmake/Ninja/msbuild/Xcode
> instead of Autotools and
Hi Magnus,
for sure, I am going to do CMake cheerleading.
I think OpenJDK would profit from a change to CMake:
1. Less tools required for building: CMake + gmake/Ninja/msbuild/Xcode
instead of Autotools and all the related Linux/Unix tools, that are
somewhat alien to Windows and OS X. Visual Stu
On 2021-03-18 00:21, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
Dear Java devs,
what do you think about the idea to replace Autotools by CMake? Is there
any chance anybody would be interested?
Would it be worth to write a feature request? Or even a JEP?
If somebody is interested I could elaborate more about wh
Dear Java devs,
what do you think about the idea to replace Autotools by CMake? Is there
any chance anybody would be interested?
Would it be worth to write a feature request? Or even a JEP?
If somebody is interested I could elaborate more about why I think CMake
has advantages over Autotools.
By
12 matches
Mail list logo
