On 2012-12-28 06:35, Helbrass wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:04:05 +0200, David Holmes
wrote:
On 28/12/2012 6:26 AM, Helbrass wrote:
Hi Phil,
First of all, you're always building both server and client for 32 bit,
what's the big deal with always building it for 64 bit?
Time and space.
But
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:04:05 +0200, David Holmes
wrote:
On 28/12/2012 6:26 AM, Helbrass wrote:
Hi Phil,
First of all, you're always building both server and client for 32 bit,
what's the big deal with always building it for 64 bit?
Time and space.
But the main point here is that 64-bit c
On 28/12/2012 6:26 AM, Helbrass wrote:
Hi Phil,
First of all, you're always building both server and client for 32 bit,
what's the big deal with always building it for 64 bit?
Time and space.
But the main point here is that 64-bit client VM is not a supported VM
configuration. As discussed i
On 12/27/2012 12:26 PM, Helbrass wrote:
Hi Phil,
First of all, you're always building both server and client for 32
bit, what's the big deal with always building it for 64 bit?
Its a huge deal. You are not just flipping an unimportant build switch.
You are adding a significant new feature to
Sorry, I have to agree with Phil here.
It has been my experience that using a server VM might add a few seconds to
startup and will use more
memory, but I found that the NetBeans GUI interactions were zippier once the VM
warmed up.
Since NetBeans startups are fairly rare, it's not a good determi
Hi Phil,
First of all, you're always building both server and client for 32 bit,
what's the big deal with always building it for 64 bit?
Second, I'm agree that in most cases server VM may be better, but in my
case I'm programmer, not server administrator, and all day long I'm using
NetBea
I am fairly sure we do not want the build system to spit out a 64 bit
client VM by default.
My recollection from many years ago is that the VM team and performance
team determined
that the 64 bit server VM was as good as, or better than the 64 bit
client VM on all the
metrics that mattered and t
On 27/12/2012 7:14 PM, Aekold Helbrass wrote:
Hi David,
Thanx for your answer. Yes, patches are really small, I hope they will
not be crippled by email renderer. See patches below.
And about new build system, can you please link me where can I read more
about it?
It is the build-infra project
Hi David,
Thanx for your answer. Yes, patches are really small, I hope they will not
be crippled by email renderer. See patches below.
And about new build system, can you please link me where can I read more
about it?
##
Hi,
Attachments get stripped by the mailing software. If the patches are
small enough please include them inline, else post them somewhere
accessible. Changes would be needed for both the old and new build systems.
Thanks,
David Holmes
On 27/12/2012 1:56 AM, Aekold Helbrass wrote:
Hi All,
Hi All,
So, last time when I asked about 64 bit ClientVM someone explained me that
it's fully compatible, just not build.
I've made 2 patches to build system to build 64 bit client VM for linux.
Unfortunately I do not have windows installation to check if it works
there, but on linux it works fin
11 matches
Mail list logo