Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-12-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/29/10 5:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote: >> On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for anything. Cer

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-29 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for > >> anything. > >> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea bui

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-29 Thread Joe Darcy
On 11/28/2010 5:52 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote: Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't use Iced Tea?? No. The binary plugs have not been required for an out-of-the-box OpenJDK 6 build since b07: "OpenJDK 6: Sources for b07 and b08 published" http://b

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Lussier, Denis wrote: > Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't > use Iced Tea?? I know I had to set them up in the OpenSCG build farm for > Windoze and Linux, last year when I started with Build 16, and they are > still there

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for >> anything. >> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea builds do. So if they >> just serve >> to confuse people to a

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/29/10 2:52 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote: > Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't > use Iced Tea?? No. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192 Oracle J

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-28 Thread Lussier, Denis
Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't use Iced Tea?? I know I had to set them up in the OpenSCG build farm for Windoze and Linux, last year when I started with Build 16, and they are still there but perhaps are unneeded. I also have the messy/scary/confusing

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-26 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 11/25/10 3:15 AM, kevin diggs wrote: >> The section of the page: >> >> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ >> >> for downloading has a heading that says: >> >> Linux platform >> >> If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than h

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-26 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/25/10 3:15 AM, kevin diggs wrote: > The section of the page: > > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ > > for downloading has a heading that says: > > Linux platform > > If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than having > i586 buried in the file/link name). > > Lin

Re: Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-25 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 20:15 Wed 24 Nov , kevin diggs wrote: > The section of the page: > > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ > > for downloading has a heading that says: > > Linux platform > > If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than having > i586 buried in the file/link name). >

Fwd: Binary plugs download

2010-11-24 Thread kevin diggs
The section of the page: http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ for downloading has a heading that says: Linux platform If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than having i586 buried in the file/link name). Linux actually runs on quite a lot of different hardware (I got me