rs?
"/bin/sh: C:Program: command not found"
or why Ant's version isn't being detected even though I provide the correct
path...
Thanks,
Gili
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-building-under-Windows7-64-bit-tp28808920p28808920.html
Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
windows-amd64/btbins
> rm -f
> C:/users/gili/DOCUME~1/jdk7/jdk7/build/windows-amd64/btbins/freetype_versioncheck.exe
> C:/PROGRA~2/MICROS~2.0/Common7/Tools/../../Vc/bin/amd64/cl /nologo /c
> -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -DREQUIRED_FREETYPE_VERSION=2.3.0
> -FoC:/users/
-
echo ${ANT_HOME} is printing out C:/PROGRA~1/APACHE~1.0 yet if you look at
the output log of "make sanity" it sees a different value. Where could this
be coming from? I am new to cygwin/bash so perhaps I am doing something
wrong in the above script.
Gili
--
View this message in con
asy way for me to figure out which file/line is causing
these
kinds of errors?
Many different issues here, like I said, windows is a pain, and you
are in uncharted territory.
Hope something I've provide helps.
-kto
"/bin/sh: C:Program: command not found"
or why Ant&#x
cause the build to fail. Please unset it
>> and start your build again.
>
> Never leave JAVA_HOME set in your environment, just 'unset JAVA_HOME',
> it's a dangerous
> thing to set when building a jdk, so we just disallow it.
>
>>
>> ERROR: Free
rogram: command not found"
or why Ant's version isn't being detected even though I provide the
correct
path...
Thanks,
Gili
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-building-under-Windows7-64-bit-tp28808920p28808920.html
Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
t;
How does one run vcvars32.bat from within a bash script? Doesn't it forget
any environment variables set by the batch file?
Thanks,
Gili
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-building-under-Windows7-64-bit-tp28808920p28813190.html
Sent from the OpenJDK Build Infrastructure mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cowwoc wrote:
> There's no good reason for Windows builds to be this difficult...
One of the major good reasons, in my personal, biased opinion,
is that Windows, contrary to Linux or OpenSolaris, lacks a central
software repository with all the necessary dependencies for a
build that would make
;, it's
> a dangerous
> thing to set when building a jdk, so we just disallow it.
>
>>
>> ERROR: FreeType version 2.3.0 or higher is required.
>> make[2]: Entering directory
>> `/cygdrive/c/users/gili/Documents/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/make/tools/freetypecheck'
On 8 June 2010 09:26, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> cowwoc wrote:
>> There's no good reason for Windows builds to be this difficult...
>
> One of the major good reasons, in my personal, biased opinion,
> is that Windows, contrary to Linux or OpenSolaris, lacks a central
> software repository with all the
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> This seems to be common with ex-proprietary codebases; I remember
> having major issues building Firefox back in the day, and some of the
> worst build systems I can think of other than OpenJDK are OpenOffice
> and Chromium...
Cross-platform build systems for native cod
On 8 June 2010 15:20, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> This seems to be common with ex-proprietary codebases; I remember
>> having major issues building Firefox back in the day, and some of the
>> worst build systems I can think of other than OpenJDK are OpenOffice
>> and Chromi
set by the batch file?
You either need to run it in a windows cmd.exe before starting up your
cygwin shell,
or look at:
http://blogs.sun.com/kto/entry/windows_visual_studio_stupid_pet
-kto
Thanks,
Gili
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-building-under-Windows7-64-b
13 matches
Mail list logo
