On 2013-04-29 14:00, David Chase wrote:
On 2013-04-29, at 5:49 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
So, do we call this a bug?
And assuming we do, it needs fixing in hotspot, jdk, and root, right?
Yes, and possibly some closed repos too (deploy). A comment on why the
seemingly redundant macro is added
On 2013-04-29, at 5:49 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>
>> So, do we call this a bug?
>> And assuming we do, it needs fixing in hotspot, jdk, and root, right?
>>
> Yes, and possibly some closed repos too (deploy). A comment on why the
> seemingly redundant macro is added would be good too.
I take
On 2013-04-25 16:48, David Chase wrote:
Related bugs: 8008451, 8005879
This may generalize to new build as well, but I have not tested that.
Apparently, when you pass " -mmacosx-version-min=..." to gcc on the Mac,
it quietly generates a definition for MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED .
Parfait (
Related bugs: 8008451, 8005879
This may generalize to new build as well, but I have not tested that.
Apparently, when you pass " -mmacosx-version-min=..." to gcc on the Mac,
it quietly generates a definition for MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED .
Parfait (1.1) doesn't know about this trick (why sh
