Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Kelly O'Hair
I need a reviewer for this change: 6987107: Add NONFCS_BUILD_INFO variable to add to but not modify MILESTONE in version string http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ohair/webrevs/jdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ It removed use of JPRT_BUILD_VERSION, adds a more generic NONFCS_BUILD_INFO. Also

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:19 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote: I need a reviewer for this change: 6987107: Add NONFCS_BUILD_INFO variable to add to but not modify MILESTONE in version string http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ohair/webrevs/jdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Bit hard to review if the host

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. -kto On Nov 24, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:19 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote: I need a reviewer for this change: 6987107: Add

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Dr Andrew John Hughes
On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. Looks ok to me. I assume the motivation is so that MILESTONE doesn't have to be duplicated in setting

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. Looks ok to me. I assume the motivation is so that

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread John Coomes
Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS these days? Aside from that, looks fine. -John

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:16 PM, John Coomes wrote: Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread David Holmes
John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16: Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/ Sorry about that. Aren't we using the term GA (general availability) instead of FCS

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread David Holmes
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 09:55: On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:47 PM, David Holmes wrote: John Coomes said the following on 11/25/10 09:16: Kelly O'Hair (kelly.oh...@oracle.com) wrote: Dang... just shoot me now. :^( Try this:

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread David Holmes
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 11:38: On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:08 PM, David Holmes wrote: Ok. So why not just USER_BUILD_INFO or CUSTOM_BUILD_INFO ? There's really no tie to FCS or not. In fact why not use USER_RELEASE_SUFFIX - see below .. It's just a name, but we were looking for

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Nov 24, 2010, at 6:06 PM, David Holmes wrote: Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/25/10 11:38: On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:08 PM, David Holmes wrote: Ok. So why not just USER_BUILD_INFO or CUSTOM_BUILD_INFO ? There's really no tie to FCS or not. In fact why not use USER_RELEASE_SUFFIX -

Re: Need reviewer: NONFCS_BUILD_INFO to add to the non-fcs version string

2010-11-24 Thread David Katleman
Hi Kelly, Logic looks fine, just a nit Unless $(NONFCS_BUILD_INFO) really needs that leading -, I'd remove it and add a - in line 110 and 297 below. Makes it a bit more readable Dave hotspot/make/defs.make 109 else 110