RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-18 Thread Doerr, Martin
: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm Hi Martin, looks good. I also verified that it removes the warning messages in the build. Approved. Best regards Christoph From: Doerr, Martin mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2021 17:50 To: jdk-u

RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-16 Thread Langer, Christoph
Hi Martin, looks good. I also verified that it removes the warning messages in the build. Approved. Best regards Christoph From: Doerr, Martin Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2021 17:50 To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph S

RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-15 Thread Doerr, Martin
Hi Götz, thanks for the review. Best regards, Martin From: Lindenmaier, Goetz Sent: Freitag, 15. Januar 2021 11:29 To: Doerr, Martin ; jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: Langer, Christoph Subject: RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when

RE: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-15 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi Martin, Trivial adaptions. Looks good. Best regards Goetz. From: Doerr, Martin Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 5:50 PM To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Langer, Christoph Subject: [11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X