Seems to me that several Oracle employees already explicitely and/or
implicitely have apologized... Is there something more you feel they
personally owe u personally?? :-)
On 5/20/10, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
> Phil,
>
> On 2010-05-19 18:20, Phil Race wrote:
>>> Kelly, to your knowledge, ha
Phil,
On 2010-05-19 18:20, Phil Race wrote:
>> Kelly, to your knowledge, has the transition to VS2010 been adopted even
>> by the formal JDK7 Release Engineering team?
>>
>
> Since you got so far as to find this doc perhaps you could actually read
> it. It says :
> *BEGIN WARNING*: At this tim
One more thing about that:
Due to resource constraints on developer time (we haven't figured out
how to clone Kelly ;-)
we (Oracle) are really only ever going to support building the JDK with
a single OS/C compiler combination, which we slowly change over time.
The OpenJDK project itself is h
What Phil says... ;^)
Zeroing in on VS2010 will remove many complex situations in the builds.
-kto
On May 19, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Phil Race wrote:
On 5/19/2010 8:38 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>no time will be spent on VS2005 or VS2008
Thanks Kelly, I'd like to understand why they won't be sup
On 5/19/2010 8:38 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>no time will be spent on VS2005 or VS2008
Thanks Kelly, I'd like to understand why they won't be supported.
1. We won't be using them at all internally so we will have no idea if
they work.
Folks will complain if we say they are supported but don'
On 5/19/2010 12:56 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Since some days, the "OpenJDK Build README" mentions Visual Studio C++
2010 as the reference compiler.
As mentioned by Kelly
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2010-May/002944.html),
the step seems to be a stable one, at least for
>no time will be spent on VS2005 or VS2008
Thanks Kelly, I'd like to understand why they won't be supported.
--
*Pete Brunet*
a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development
(512) 238-6967 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell)
Skype:
On May 19, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Since some days, the "OpenJDK Build README" mentions Visual Studio C++
2010 as the reference compiler.
That is the current plan, to convert to VS2010. Phil Race has pushed
some recent changes to allow for
VS2010 builds in the jdk7/bui
David
-Original Message-
From: build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:36 AM
To: Raffaello Giulietti
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2010
Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
David Dabbs wrote:
> FWIW, Windows 7 "Enterprise" is supposed to ship with Microsoft's Unix
> compatibility bits, so conceivably no MKS or Cygwin would be required.
I haven't seen anyone post on this list about (successfully or not)
trying to use Interix at all for a build so far, so I wouldn't p
Thanks Pete, but I already reported my Windows build history with VS2008
here
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2010-May/002955.html).
I was just curious about the commitment to VS2010. From the response by
Erik, I decided to wait some time before I'll ever try my next Windows
buil
Raffaello, If you'd like to get started before the build is updated I
can give you some hints based on my experience with VS 2008. Back in
November I was successful in building b75 with the Standard Edition of
VS 2008. I assume the Express version would also work, possibly with
some similar adjus
ik Trimble
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:36 AM
To: Raffaello Giulietti
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2010
Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
> Since some days, the "OpenJDK Build README" mentions Visual Studio C++
> 2010 as the reference compiler.
&g
Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Since some days, the "OpenJDK Build README" mentions Visual Studio C++
2010 as the reference compiler.
As mentioned by Kelly
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2010-May/002944.html),
the step seems to be a stable one, at least for some years, I guess.
K
14 matches
Mail list logo
