RE: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-05 Thread Ron Durbin
Dan The changes look good Ron > -Original Message- > From: Daniel D. Daugherty > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:21 PM > To: hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; > serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev; > Doug Simon; Tom Rodriguez > Subject: code review round 0 for minor

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-05 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Ron, Thanks for the review. Dan On 2/5/14 7:04 PM, Ron Durbin wrote: Dan The changes look good Ron -Original Message- From: Daniel D. Daugherty Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:21 PM To: hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev; Doug

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-05 Thread David Holmes
Hi Dan, Looks good to me. (I never run the install targets :( ) Thanks, David On 6/02/2014 9:20 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: This code review request is going to three different aliases. Don't use Thunderbird's "reply to list" option since it will pick just _one_ of the _three_ lists. Gree

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 2/5/14 9:28 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Dan, Looks good to me. Thanks for the review! (I never run the install targets :( ) Neither do I and apparently neither does JPRT... That's how this slipped through the cracks... Dan Thanks, David On 6/02/2014 9:20 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wr

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Tom Rodriguez
Looks good to me too. Thanks for fixing this. tom On Feb 6, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > On 2/5/14 9:28 PM, David Holmes wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> Looks good to me. > > Thanks for the review! > > >> (I never run the install targets :( ) > > Neither do I and apparently nei

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 2/6/14 9:29 AM, Doug Simon wrote: Not sure if I’m being asked for a review, but if so, looks good. Yes, I was looking for a review. In particular because I tweaked your original fix... Thanks for the review! Dan On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote: Looks good to me too.

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Simon
Not sure if I’m being asked for a review, but if so, looks good. On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote: > Looks good to me too. Thanks for fixing this. > > tom > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 6:07 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty > wrote: > >> On 2/5/14 9:28 PM, David Holmes wrote: >>> Hi Dan, >>>

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Tim Bell
On 02/ 6/14 08:32 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Looks good to me, Dan Tim On 6/02/2014 9:20 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: This code review request is going to three different aliases. Don't use Thunderbird's "reply to list" option since it will pick just _one_ of the _three_ lists. Greeti

Re: code review round 0 for minor FDS makefile fix (8033714)

2014-02-06 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Thanks for the review! Dan On 2/6/14 9:53 AM, Tim Bell wrote: On 02/ 6/14 08:32 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Looks good to me, Dan Tim On 6/02/2014 9:20 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: This code review request is going to three different aliases. Don't use Thunderbird's "reply to list" o