On 22/03/16 22:57, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2016, at 6:12 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> The change got pushed before I had a chance to look at the revised
> version, but I wanted to get back to this part of the discussion.
Great!
> I agree that Node::operator new invokes UB. It's also ra
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 6:12 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
The change got pushed before I had a chance to look at the revised
version, but I wanted to get back to this part of the discussion.
> On 15/03/16 19:15, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:18 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>
>> I’ll prob
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2016-03-18 05:42, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
On 2016-03-16 05:25, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello,
As representative for the build-infra group creating the new Hotspot
build, I appreciate that the changes are made in
- Original Message -
> Looks good to me.
>
> /Erik
>
Thanks. Pushed:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/9d77f922d694
--
Andrew :)
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D15
- Original Message -
> On 2016-03-16 05:25, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> As representative for the build-infra group creating the new Hotspot
> >> build, I appreciate that the changes are made in configure. That will at
> >> least automatical
On 15/03/16 19:15, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:18 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> I’ll probably have more to say later; just responding to one point here.
>
2. A number of optimisations in GCC 6 lead to a broken JVM. We need to
add -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks and -fno
On 2016-03-16 05:25, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello,
As representative for the build-infra group creating the new Hotspot
build, I appreciate that the changes are made in configure. That will at
least automatically force me to merge them correctly when they hit the
buil
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> As representative for the build-infra group creating the new Hotspot
> build, I appreciate that the changes are made in configure. That will at
> least automatically force me to merge them correctly when they hit the
> build-infra forest and will make the
- Original Message -
> Just a couple of FYIs:
>
> 1. hotspot groups require copyright updates on pushes to hotspot
> forests; other groups do not. Hence many non-hotspot sources have out of
> date copyrights - these will eventually be fixed en-masse.
>
Ok, file updated.
> 2. The CXXFL
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:18 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
I’ll probably have more to say later; just responding to one point here.
>>> 2. A number of optimisations in GCC 6 lead to a broken JVM. We need to
>>> add -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks and -fno-lifetime-dse to get a
>>> working JVM.
>>
>>
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 18:55 -0400, Kim Barrett wrote:
[...]
> >
> > 2. A number of optimisations in GCC 6 lead to a broken JVM. We need to
> > add -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks and -fno-lifetime-dse to get a
> > working JVM.
> I don't have any suggestions for why gcc6 might be having problems
>
Hello,
As representative for the build-infra group creating the new Hotspot
build, I appreciate that the changes are made in configure. That will at
least automatically force me to merge them correctly when they hit the
build-infra forest and will make the merge easier. The idea is to start
g
Just a couple of FYIs:
1. hotspot groups require copyright updates on pushes to hotspot
forests; other groups do not. Hence many non-hotspot sources have out of
date copyrights - these will eventually be fixed en-masse.
2. The CXXFLAGS situation, as alluded, arose out of confusion with the
o
- Original Message -
> > On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151841
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/8151841/webrev.01/
> >
> > A number of additional flags need to be passed to the C and C++ compiler
> >
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151841
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/8151841/webrev.01/
>
> A number of additional flags need to be passed to the C and C++ compiler
> for OpenJDK to compile with GCC 6:
This mi
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151841
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/8151841/webrev.01/
A number of additional flags need to be passed to the C and C++ compiler
for OpenJDK to compile with GCC 6:
1. The C++ standard needs to be explicitly lowered to the old default of
16 matches
Mail list logo
