Re: RFR: 8256657: Add cross-compiled build for Windows+Arm64 to submit workflow [v4]

2020-12-08 Thread Bernhard Urban-Forster
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:59:23 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> Minor nits. > > Also merge from master to get the clean workflow run everywhere? Thank you @shipilev for your comments, I've updated the PR. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1379

Re: RFR: 8256657: Add cross-compiled build for Windows+Arm64 to submit workflow [v4]

2020-12-07 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:58:49 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> Bernhard Urban-Forster has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> merge mistakes > > Minor nits. Also merge from master to get the clean workflow run everywhere?

Re: RFR: 8256657: Add cross-compiled build for Windows+Arm64 to submit workflow [v4]

2020-12-07 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:34:26 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster wrote: >> This adds the cross-compiled build only, as no Windows+Arm64 machines are >> available on GitHub Action that we could use to run the tests. >> >> Due to cross-compilation a build JDK is required. Initially I added EA >> builds

Re: RFR: 8256657: Add cross-compiled build for Windows+Arm64 to submit workflow [v4]

2020-12-07 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:34:26 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster wrote: >> This adds the cross-compiled build only, as no Windows+Arm64 machines are >> available on GitHub Action that we could use to run the tests. >> >> Due to cross-compilation a build JDK is required. Initially I added EA >> builds

Re: RFR: 8256657: Add cross-compiled build for Windows+Arm64 to submit workflow [v4]

2020-12-07 Thread Bernhard Urban-Forster
> This adds the cross-compiled build only, as no Windows+Arm64 machines are > available on GitHub Action that we could use to run the tests. > > Due to cross-compilation a build JDK is required. Initially I added EA builds > to be downloaded from https://jdk.java.net/16/ and used for that, but