Hello,
That's a fair point. We did aim for 2012 when trying to do this work for
JDK 8, but it hasn't been tried (at least not that I know) for a while
now. I agree that perhaps 2010 should be prioritized before 2012 since
it has been an official compiler. On the other hand, 2012 is much
Hello Volker,
Certainly, adding to todo list for next week when this is done. Thanks
for the reminder.
/Erik
On 2015-04-02 11:22, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Erik,
can you please also update
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+Build+Platforms
once this change has been
On 2015-04-02 11:09, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this change which will make the official switch of the
preferred compiler toolchain on Windows for JDK 9.
Changes are needed in:
* configure, for changing the default when multiple versions are
available
* jprt.properties, for
Hi Erik,
can you please also update
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+Build+Platforms
once this change has been submitted and is in effect.
Thanks,
Volker
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Please review this change
Hello,
Please review this change which will make the official switch of the
preferred compiler toolchain on Windows for JDK 9.
Changes are needed in:
* configure, for changing the default when multiple versions are available
* jprt.properties, for picking the right type of machine for Oracle
Hello Erik
On 04/02/15 02:13, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-04-02 11:09, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Please review this change which will make the official switch of the
preferred compiler toolchain on Windows for JDK 9.
Changes are needed in:
* configure, for changing the default
I am a bit surprised to note we'd prefer 2012 over 2010.
.. and that we'd been preferring it over 2013. Seems odd to have a version
that was never the 'official' compiler be preferred over offical versions.
It won't affect me as I don't have 2012 but might affect someone else.
So if someone has
