> On Jan 26, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> When the last jake->jdk9 push was done, a temporary workaround for dealing
> with Javafx was needed. Javafx has now been fully updated to only deliver the
> new format so the workaround should be removed.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.ja
On 26/01/2017 14:36, Erik Joelsson wrote:
When the last jake->jdk9 push was done, a temporary workaround for
dealing with Javafx was needed. Javafx has now been fully updated to
only deliver the new format so the workaround should be removed.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170
When the last jake->jdk9 push was done, a temporary workaround for
dealing with Javafx was needed. Javafx has now been fully updated to
only deliver the new format so the workaround should be removed.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170483
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eri