Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-25 Thread Michal Vala
Hi Erik, yes, I understand that. I'm pointing out to current inconsistency between documentation and code. There is currently no overlap (2010-2013 in doc vs 2015+ in code). I understand that VS version will go up, but it's not the case yet. Also keep the code backward compatible is not a

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-24 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello, We will most likely need to drop support for older VS in JDK 12 as there is much interest to move to a later C++ standard in Hotspot. That change has not happened yet though and will certainly require a JEP (the C++ standard change part). In the meantime, if you need JDK 12 to work on

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-24 Thread Michal Vala
Aha, this is for 11. It's ok then. On 07/24/2018 08:02 AM, Michal Vala wrote: Hi, On 07/23/2018 07:13 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler updates that took place at Oracle for JDK 11. Bug:

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-24 Thread Michal Vala
Hi, On 07/23/2018 07:13 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler updates that took place at Oracle for JDK 11. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208096 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8208096/webrev.01/ /Erik

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-23 Thread Martin Buchholz
OHH ... thanks for the lesson. I'm disappointed by Apple's apparently deliberate version obfuscation. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33603027/get-apple-clang-version-and-corresponding-upstream-llvm-version On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > That's what the compiler

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-23 Thread Erik Joelsson
That's what the compiler says: $ clang --version Apple LLVM version 9.1.0 (clang-902.0.39.2) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin17.6.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin I don't know how that version relates to the

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-23 Thread Tim Bell
Erik: The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler updates that took place at Oracle for JDK 11. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208096 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8208096/webrev.01/ Looks good. /Tim

Re: RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-23 Thread Martin Buchholz
+ macOS Apple Xcode 9.4 (using clang 9.1.0) Is there really such a thing as clang 9.1.0, given that 6.0.1 is the latest from http://releases.llvm.org/ ? On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler >

RFR: Update build documentation to reflect compiler upgrades at Oracle

2018-07-23 Thread Erik Joelsson
The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler updates that took place at Oracle for JDK 11. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208096 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8208096/webrev.01/ /Erik