Re: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - compact profiles footprint

2014-12-06 Thread Alan Bateman
On 05/12/2014 17:57, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: On 04.12.2014 20:11, Alan Bateman wrote: We've now moved to world where the runtime images are created from a set of modules and this should give a lot of flexibility once. We're just not there yet with locale data so we have to temporarily link in

Re: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - compact profiles footprint

2014-12-05 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On 04.12.2014 20:11, Alan Bateman wrote: We've now moved to world where the runtime images are created from a set of modules and this should give a lot of flexibility once. We're just not there yet with locale data so we have to temporarily link in the big jdk.localedata module so that the

Re: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - compact profiles footprint

2014-12-04 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/12/2014 12:58, Xerxes Rånby wrote: The footprint of the compact profiles have been inflated by ~12Mb each after the JEP 220 changes. before # du -s -h j2re-compact1-image 17.9Mj2re-compact1-image # du -s -h j2re-compact2-image 28.7Mj2re-compact2-image # du -s -h

Re: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - compact profiles footprint

2014-12-04 Thread Naoto Sato
Quick question. Why is jdk.localedata module included in the compact profiles? The data there used to be in lib/ext/localedata.jar and lib/ext/cldrdata.jar which weren't included in those compact profiles. Naoto On 12/4/14, 5:48 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 04/12/2014 12:58, Xerxes Rånby

Re: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - compact profiles footprint

2014-12-04 Thread Alan Bateman
On 04/12/2014 16:38, Naoto Sato wrote: Quick question. Why is jdk.localedata module included in the compact profiles? The data there used to be in lib/ext/localedata.jar and lib/ext/cldrdata.jar which weren't included in those compact profiles. Naoto The profiles make target on JDK 8 (and JDK