On 2015-03-03 15:03, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2015-03-03 13:53, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-03-03 12:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
That combination didn't actually build for me. When compiling
jdk.jconsole, the following happened:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$
On 2015-03-03 13:53, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-03-03 12:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
That combination didn't actually build for me. When compiling
jdk.jconsole, the following happened:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$CompletionFailure: class file for
java.awt
On 2015-03-03 12:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
That combination didn't actually build for me. When compiling
jdk.jconsole, the following happened:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$CompletionFailure: class file for
java.awt.datatransfer.UnsupportedFlavorException not foun
That combination didn't actually build for me. When compiling
jdk.jconsole, the following happened:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol$CompletionFailure: class file for
java.awt.datatransfer.UnsupportedFlavorException not found
at
com.sun.tools.javac.api.JavacTask
Hello,
Here is my suggestion for makefile changes to go with the sjavac
changes. Adding build-dev to get review for my part.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8054717/webrev.root.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054717
/Erik
On 2015-03-02 13:31, Andreas Lundblad wro
It seems like the development speed for sjavac needs to be increased
significantly, one JIRA bug, one 2 week review cycle, leads to one commit
is much too slow. I belive it would be good to have a separate repository
to do quicker development of sjavac, and test out all sorts of interesting
stuff,
