On 22/01/2017 19:27, Xueming Shen wrote:
The assumption is the remove of the version tag can help us to easily
get the
diffs from the webrev directly in future upgrade.
Here is the webrev with the diff by listing old and new files in a
webrev list file.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8
Build changes look good. Thanks!
/Erik
On 2017-01-21 21:41, Xueming Shen wrote:
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Thanks,
Sherman
On 1/21/17, 12:30 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Build changes
On 1/22/17, 9:46 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/01/2017 20:41, Xueming Shen wrote:
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Switching to zlib looks good although it's impossible to see the
changes in this
On 21/01/2017 20:41, Xueming Shen wrote:
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Switching to zlib looks good although it's impossible to see the changes
in this webrev because all the files show up as ne
Erik, Alan
Here is the webrev that dropped the version number from the name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8173140/webrev
Thanks,
Sherman
On 1/21/17, 12:30 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Build changes look ok. I'm in favor with dropping the version number
from the path. There is a RE
On 20/01/2017 20:15, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi,
Please review the change to upgrade the zlib bundled in jdk repo from
v1.2.8
to v1.2.11. jdk9 by default has been configured to build by using the
native/
platform/os's zlib on all non-windows platform [1] So the change will
only have
effect on th
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Build changes look ok. I'm in favor with dropping the version number from
> the path. There is a README that clearly states the current version and we
> don't keep multiple versions in the repo anyway. Doing so would also red
Hello,
Build changes look ok. I'm in favor with dropping the version number
from the path. There is a README that clearly states the current version
and we don't keep multiple versions in the repo anyway. Doing so would
also reduce repo meta data bloat from doing these upgrades in the future
Hi,
Please review the change to upgrade the zlib bundled in jdk repo from v1.2.8
to v1.2.11. jdk9 by default has been configured to build by using the
native/
platform/os's zlib on all non-windows platform [1] So the change will
only have
effect on the Windows' binaries.
issue: https://bugs.o
