On 27.11.2017 15:17, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Also the question of who is supposed to maintain it in the long run should
be answered. We are usually quite strict in adding new platforms - I
remember the recent BSD port discussions, which I believe ended in 1) needs
a long term maintainer, preferably a
> for this platform.
>>
>>
>> Once again, please advise on what is the best way to move forward, or stop
>>> this effort.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is not my place to advice you or to decide anything. People from the
>> build group would have to
fe
*Sent:* Thursday, November 23, 2017 10:36:07 PM
*To:* Lussier, Denis
*Cc:* Jonathan Gibbons; [email protected]; Peter Budai
*Subject:* Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Lussier, Denis
wrote:
This is good stuff. Back in 2010 I got OpenJDK compiled an
November 23, 2017 10:36:07 PM
> *To:* Lussier, Denis
> *Cc:* Jonathan Gibbons; [email protected]; Peter Budai
>
> *Subject:* Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Lussier, Denis
> wrote:
>
>> This is good stuff. Back in 2010 I g
Cc: Jonathan Gibbons; [email protected]; Peter Budai
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Lussier, Denis
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This is good stuff. Back in 2010 I got OpenJDK compiled and running on the
Microsoft Toolchain. I nev
> have mentioned earlier that you would like to consider this to JDK10
> >>
> >> So what is the best way to open a PR for review? This page:
> >> http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ says I should send the changeset as
> >> attachment, but earlier somebody mentio
pen a PR for review? This page:
>> http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/ says I should send the changeset as
>> attachment, but earlier somebody mentioned here that attachments are
>> removed from the developer mailing lists.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Peter
&g
[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
I would say a few hours is way too long for tier1, but it of course
depends on the hardware used. We typically run it on windows in less
than 30 minutes with concurrency set to 6. N
[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
I would say a few hours is way too long for tier1, but it of course
depends on the hardware used. We typ
I tried Peter Budai's patches from mingw-w64-openjdk branch, but it failed
due to using dlfcn.h instead of windows.h in
jdk9-jdk-9+181/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp.
After guarding dlfcn.h with #ifdef linux #endif and adding the windows.h
include, it compiled fine until
then share that with you.
P.
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 11:00 AM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on
[email protected]>
Cc: David Holmes<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9
To: Peter Budai <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: David Holmes <mailto:[email protected]>; Erik Joelsson
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse Bursie
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:build-dev@openjdk
lto:[email protected]>
*Cc: *David Holmes <mailto:[email protected]>; Erik Joelsson
<mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse Bursie
<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: B
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Can you provide some details about your toolchain, processor and os plus
a dump of the native instructions around the SEGV. This might give us
enough info to be able to figure out what’s going
elsson<mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Was this a SEGV while you were running the debugger?
There is an intentional SEGV generat
gt;; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Can you provide some details about your toolchain, processor and os plus
a dump of the native instructions around the SEGV
Joelsson
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse Bursie
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
>
> Was this a SEGV while you were running the debu
gt;; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Was this a SEGV while you were running the debugger?
There is an intentional SEGV generated. This is used to determine if we
[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse
> Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
>
> On 16/10/2017 12:41 AM, Peter Budai wrote:
>> A quick status update:
&
dk.java.net<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
On 16/10/2017 12:41 AM, Peter Budai wrote:
> A quick status update:
>
>* Hotspot successfully compiled without warnings
>* I’d like to run the unit tests, but as I see ‘make check’ does no
: Erik Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 4:16 PM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>; Peter
Budai<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building Open
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: B
;mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Hello Peter,
On 2017-10-11 00:18, Peter Budai wrote:
Thanks Magnus & Erik
First thanks for your support and kind words!
Magnus, I ha
> Peter
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: Erik Joelsson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:16 PM
> To: Peter Budai; Magnus Ihse Bursie; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
>
> Hello Peter,
>
>
> On 201
Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:16 PM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Ihse
Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Hello Peter,
On 2017-10-11 00:18,
Ihse Bursie <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:04 AM
*To: *Peter Budai <mailto:[email protected]>; Erik Joelsson
<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Buildin
[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
On 2017-1
[email protected]>
*Sent: *Friday, October 6, 2017 6:43 PM
*To: *Magnus Ihse Bursie <mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
om>; Erik
Joelsson <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Magnus,
I have followed your suggestion and removed the fixpath prefixes from
gcc related compile tools, and left only the f
o:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 3:52 PM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS
>
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 3:52 PM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Hi Magnus,
So first of all, her
rsday, October 5, 2017 12:13 PM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
On 2017-10-05 11:59, Peter Budai wrote:
Hi Magnus and Erik,
[email protected]>
*Sent: *Thursday, October 5, 2017 11:33 AM
*To: *Erik Joelsson <mailto:[email protected]>; Peter Budai
<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
, 2017 11:59 AM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>; Erik
Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Hi Magnus and Erik,
I really appreciate your qui
<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Hi Magnus and Erik,
I really appreciate your quick feedback. I assumed that it won’t be easy, but I
just don’t feel I should give up now - maybe later
dows 10
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 11:33 AM
To: Erik Joelsson<mailto:[email protected]>; Peter
Budai<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject
ctober 4, 2017 1:04 AM
To: Peter Budai<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Actually, it wasn't so much remaining trouble. :-) I fired up msys2 and
checked out where I left off. It
[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Actually, it wasn't so much remaining trouble. :-) I fired up msys2 and
checked out where I left off. It turned out that the remaining snag was
that msys2 tries t
a.net<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building OpenJDK9 on MSYS2
Actually, it wasn't so much remaining trouble. :-) I fired up msys2 and
checked out where I left off. It turned out that the remaining snag was
that msys2 tries to convert command lines automatically, from &
Actually, it wasn't so much remaining trouble. :-) I fired up msys2 and
checked out where I left off. It turned out that the remaining snag was
that msys2 tries to convert command lines automatically, from "unix"
style paths to "windows" style paths. Unfortunately, it does not do this
very well
I gave msys2 a shot some time ago, but it ended up too much trouble.
I'll share some of my notes from that attempt, for what it's worth.
To install package X/Y, run "pacman -S X/Y". Missing tools and packages
where to find them:
cmp: msys/diffutils
tar: msys/tar
make: msys/make
unzip: msys/unz
42 matches
Mail list logo
