Re: Command line acceptance of binary plugs license?

2009-08-04 Thread Vinod Kutty
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Vinod Kutty wrote: On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Andrew John Hughes wrote: The binary plugs are only now needed for the SNMP plugin, which is optional and not part of the Java specification. Everything else has been replaced by Free alternatives. That's good to hear. I will

Re: Command line acceptance of binary plugs license?

2009-08-02 Thread Vinod Kutty
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Andrew John Hughes wrote: The binary plugs are only now needed for the SNMP plugin, which is optional and not part of the Java specification. Everything else has been replaced by Free alternatives. That's good to hear. I will try without them. Thanks, -- VK

Re: Command line acceptance of binary plugs license?

2009-08-01 Thread Joseph D. Darcy
Vinod Kutty wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build openjdk7-ea-b67, so I downloaded the self-extracting binary plugs and tried to extract it. You no longer need the binary plugs to perform an openjdk=true build. -Joe Unfortunately, it assumes a graphical environment for the license agreement

Re: Command line acceptance of binary plugs license?

2009-08-01 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Vinod Kutty wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build openjdk7-ea-b67, so I downloaded the self- extracting binary plugs and tried to extract it. You no longer need the binary plugs to perform an openjdk=true build. Oh, I've never heard about

Re: Command line acceptance of binary plugs license?

2009-08-01 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/8/2 Max (Weijun) Wang weijun.w...@sun.com: On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Vinod Kutty wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build openjdk7-ea-b67, so I downloaded the self-extracting binary plugs and tried to extract it. You no longer need the binary plugs to perform an