On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:26 PM, cowwoc wrote:
Hi Kelly,
kelly.ohair-2 wrote:
Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a
build machine, it should work, but in
general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows releases,
e.g. 2000 and soon that newer one "XP" ;^)
On 8 June 2010 15:20, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> This seems to be common with ex-proprietary codebases; I remember
>> having major issues building Firefox back in the day, and some of the
>> worst build systems I can think of other than OpenJDK are OpenOffice
>> and Chromi
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> This seems to be common with ex-proprietary codebases; I remember
> having major issues building Firefox back in the day, and some of the
> worst build systems I can think of other than OpenJDK are OpenOffice
> and Chromium...
Cross-platform build systems for native cod
On 8 June 2010 09:26, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> cowwoc wrote:
>> There's no good reason for Windows builds to be this difficult...
>
> One of the major good reasons, in my personal, biased opinion,
> is that Windows, contrary to Linux or OpenSolaris, lacks a central
> software repository with all the
On 7 June 2010 20:21, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a build
> machine, it should work, but in
> general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows releases, e.g.
> 2000 and soon that newer one "XP" ;^)
> You are trying a 64bit buil
cowwoc wrote:
> There's no good reason for Windows builds to be this difficult...
One of the major good reasons, in my personal, biased opinion,
is that Windows, contrary to Linux or OpenSolaris, lacks a central
software repository with all the necessary dependencies for a
build that would make
Hi Kelly,
kelly.ohair-2 wrote:
>
> Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a
> build machine, it should work, but in
> general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows releases,
> e.g. 2000 and soon that newer one "XP" ;^)
> You are trying a 64bit build wi
Can you provide some detailed instructions so I could add it to the
README-builds.html file?
-kto
On Jun 7, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
The latest Freetype sources build quite easily on Windoze (at least on
Win32 using VS2003).
On 6/7/10, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Note that Window
The latest Freetype sources build quite easily on Windoze (at least on
Win32 using VS2003).
On 6/7/10, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a
> build machine, it should work, but in
> general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows r
Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a
build machine, it should work, but in
general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows releases,
e.g. 2000 and soon that newer one "XP" ;^)
You are trying a 64bit build with Visual Studio 10, on Windows 7, an
even
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> I've never built on Windows, nor would I ever want to. But at a
> guess, your problem here is that you have spaces in your path to ant.
> Move it to something like C:\ant and you'll probably get further.
>
You are right, but I can't figure out why. Here is the sc
On 7 June 2010 19:27, cowwoc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am attempting to build OpenJDK under Windows7 64-bit, Visual Studio 2010.
> Here is the output of "make sanity":
>
> --
> ( cd ./jdk/make && \
> make sanity HOTSPOT_IMPORT_CHECK=false
> JDK_TOPDIR=C:/users/gili/DOCUME~1/jdk7/j
12 matches
Mail list logo
