Hiya Magnus ,
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 15:08 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> David,
>
> Is this IBM variant of OpenJDK something that is publically available?
> If so, I'd like to take a peek at it.
>
> /Magnus
>
I have sought advice as to the public availability and will keep you
posted ...
On 2013-11-25 13:06, Dave Pointon wrote:
I believe that this piece of work belongs in the infrastructure in as
much as I'm merely ( :-) ) attempting to adapt the IBM JDK build and
all the accompanying niceties, more into line with the OpenJDK
approach such that the additional effort necessary to
Hi David ,
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:07 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> This all seems very complex and I'm unclear exactly what it would do or
> why it would be needed (at this level of flexibility). Our own use of
> the variant mechanism doesn't require this level of ability. Note y
Hi Dave,
This all seems very complex and I'm unclear exactly what it would do or
why it would be needed (at this level of flexibility). Our own use of
the variant mechanism doesn't require this level of ability. Note your
subdirectory of variants needs to allow for some variants being defined
Hi Magnus et al ,
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:30 +, Dave Pointon wrote:
> In the process of attempting to describe the changes I'm playing with,
> I've realized that I've made a coupla wrong assumptions and completely
> inflexible and thus inappropriate, design decisions. I'll post further
> onc
Hiya Magnus ,
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 14:18 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2013-11-18 21:05, David Holmes wrote:
> > Of course these configuration points have been defined based on our
> > needs for the Oracle JDK versus OpenJDK, so there is no claim of
> > general applicability or suitabil
On 2013-11-18 21:05, David Holmes wrote:
Of course these configuration points have been defined based on our
needs for the Oracle JDK versus OpenJDK, so there is no claim of
general applicability or suitability for all potential users who want
to customize the build and/or sources. Happy to ada
On 19/11/2013 3:25 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Dave,
what you are trying to achieve sounds a little bit like Oracles
"closed" build. As far as I know, they allow for extra directories
(which are realized as Mercurial forests on their own) which can be
linked into the open sources at special "mo
Hi Dave,
what you are trying to achieve sounds a little bit like Oracles
"closed" build. As far as I know, they allow for extra directories
(which are realized as Mercurial forests on their own) which can be
linked into the open sources at special "mount points". Just grep for
CLOSED_SOURCE_PRESEN
