I have been bitten by this change - not something too difficult to
handle, but I think it can be confusing - e.g. if you run 'make
reconfigure' the old config name will be preserved, but if you run 'sh
configure' from scratch you will have two configuration sitting beside
each other and any mak
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-09-20 11:42, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-09-20 19:47, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-09-20 10:24, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-09-20 18:59, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 09/20/2018 06:48 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A long time ago, we supported differen
On 2018-09-20 19:47, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-09-20 10:24, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-09-20 18:59, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 09/20/2018 06:48 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A long time ago, we supported different "variants" of the JDK
build, like "normal" and "embedded".
The --
On 2018-09-20 11:35, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
I guess the question is how much variability is there in day-to-day builds. As
the guy who builds
lots of different configurations, I see great simplicity in maintaining current
static label that
captures most of the usual variability. For example,
On 09/20/2018 07:24 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Currently the default format looks like this:
> "linux-x86_64-normal-server-release", that is
> . The selection of these
> configuration
> parameters feels a bit arbitrary. Some examples of other parameters we could
> have included, but
> d
On 2018-09-20 10:24, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-09-20 18:59, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 09/20/2018 06:48 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A long time ago, we supported different "variants" of the JDK build,
like "normal" and "embedded".
The --with-jdk-variant and associated machinery has
On 2018-09-20 18:59, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 09/20/2018 06:48 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A long time ago, we supported different "variants" of the JDK build, like "normal" and
"embedded".
The --with-jdk-variant and associated machinery has been kept in place, even
though it's not doin
On 09/20/2018 06:48 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> A long time ago, we supported different "variants" of the JDK build, like
> "normal" and "embedded".
> The --with-jdk-variant and associated machinery has been kept in place, even
> though it's not doing
> anyting. Time to remove it.
>
> I chos
