On 17:12 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 11:58 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Can someone please tell me why:
> >>>
On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 11:58 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can someone please tell me why:
>>>
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
>>>
>>
On 11:58 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone please tell me why:
> >
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
> >
> > reverted my earlier fix:
> >
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jd
On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please tell me why:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
>
> reverted my earlier fix:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/80368890a2a0
>
> without any discussion?
My apologies,
Hi,
Can someone please tell me why:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
reverted my earlier fix:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/80368890a2a0
without any discussion?
The correct fix would have been to bump the boot source language/target class
versions to 7, not