Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-12 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good to me though I'm not a jdk7 reviewer. /Erik On 2013-07-12 07:22, Tim Bell wrote: David, Erik - Thanks for the feedback: Does this also need to check for OPENJDK in case you are doing an OPENJDK build with a full forest present? Or is this logic already by-passed for OPENJDK

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-12 Thread David Holmes
On 12/07/2013 4:57 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me though I'm not a jdk7 reviewer. I am :) Tim I think this is okay. Certainly it only makes sense to build install bundles if building install. I just wonder why building install bundles has to appear at this top-level anyway. But

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-12 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 7/12/13 8:57 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me though I'm not a jdk7 reviewer. Looks good to me, too. Local OpenJDK build on OS X and an OpenJDK linux build on JPRT both passed. Please send in a fresh phase 2 approval request to the jdk7u-dev list. cheers, dalibor topic /Erik

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-12 Thread Tim Bell
On 07/12/13 12:02 AM, David Holmes wrote: I am :) Tim I think this is okay. Certainly it only makes sense to build install bundles if building install. Good. Thanks for the review. I just wonder why building install bundles has to appear at this top-level anyway. But that's a different

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-11 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-07-11 07:30, David Holmes wrote: Tim, On 11/07/2013 6:47 AM, Tim Bell wrote: On 07/10/13 12:37 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Kelly How did BUILD_INSTALL ever become true on an OpenJDK build? From the 'generic_debug_build' rule in the top level 7update Makefile [1] generic_debug_build:

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-11 Thread Tim Bell
David, Erik - Thanks for the feedback: Does this also need to check for OPENJDK in case you are doing an OPENJDK build with a full forest present? Or is this logic already by-passed for OPENJDK builds? David Setting OPENJDK=true on the command line will force BUILD_INSTALL=false, even

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-10 Thread David Katleman
On 7/10/2013 12:37 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Kelly How did BUILD_INSTALL ever become true on an OpenJDK build? There is only one place that the build itself sets BUILD_INSTALL to true and that's upon detection of install/make/Makefile, in make/Defs-internal.gmk: If you have a full forest

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-10 Thread Tim Bell
On 07/10/13 12:37 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Kelly How did BUILD_INSTALL ever become true on an OpenJDK build? From the 'generic_debug_build' rule in the top level 7update Makefile [1] generic_debug_build: $(MAKE) \ ALT_OUTPUTDIR=$(ABS_OUTPUTDIR)/$(REL_JDK_OUTPUTDIR) \

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-10 Thread David Holmes
Tim, On 11/07/2013 6:47 AM, Tim Bell wrote: On 07/10/13 12:37 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Hi Kelly How did BUILD_INSTALL ever become true on an OpenJDK build? From the 'generic_debug_build' rule in the top level 7update Makefile [1] generic_debug_build: $(MAKE) \

Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-08 Thread Tim Bell
All- My fix for 8007815 [1] did not handle the case of an OpenJDK build that does not have the closed source trees. If a user tries to build that far, the build will fail with cd: can't cd to ./install/make/installer/binaries/linux This is a request for review and approval to fix 8012366

Re: Request for review and approval to fix 8012366 in 7update

2013-07-08 Thread Kelly O'Hair
How did BUILD_INSTALL ever become true on an OpenJDK build? -kto On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Tim Bell wrote: All- My fix for 8007815 [1] did not handle the case of an OpenJDK build that does not have the closed source trees. If a user tries to build that far, the build will fail with