Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Ulf Zibis
Am 10.11.2011 15:04, schrieb Dalibor Topic: On 11/10/11 2:25 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote: Hi all, as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all participants. While that is an understandable opinion on the

Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Dalibor Topic
On 11/10/11 2:25 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote: > Hi all, > > as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did > "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all > participants. While that is an understandable opinion on the side of any e-mail author, in pract

Re: Request to mailing list discuss rejected regarding "Re: Where have all the "fastdebug" builds gone?"

2011-11-10 Thread Ulf Zibis
Hi all, as disc...@openjdk.java.net was in the cc-list of those 3 posts, I just did "answer to all", as I thought my post would be interesting to all participants. I think, list moderators should accept such posts from un-subscribed senders, to avoid communication thread gaps. What is the r