+1
libmanagement_agent is indeed a better name :-)
best regards,
-- daniel
On 02/02/17 22:27, Mandy Chung wrote:
libmanagement_agent should be the proper library name for jdk.management.agent.
It was an oversight with the current name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/81738
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2017-02-02 23:27, Mandy Chung wrote:
libmanagement_agent should be the proper library name for jdk.management.agent.
It was an oversight with the current name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8173858/webrev.00/
This patch also takes out the qualified ex
On 02/02/2017 22:27, Mandy Chung wrote:
libmanagement_agent should be the proper library name for jdk.management.agent.
It was an oversight with the current name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8173858/webrev.00/
This patch also takes out the qualified exports of java.base/j
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> Looks reasonable.
>
> No tests that need changing?
>
No since it’s just the shared library name change. The shared library provides
the native method implementation for jdk.internal.agent.FileSystem (no change
there)
Man
Hi Mandy,
Looks reasonable.
No tests that need changing?
Thanks,
David
On 3/02/2017 8:27 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
libmanagement_agent should be the proper library name for jdk.management.agent.
It was an oversight with the current name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8173858
libmanagement_agent should be the proper library name for jdk.management.agent.
It was an oversight with the current name.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8173858/webrev.00/
This patch also takes out the qualified exports of java.base/jdk.internal.vm
to java.management which i
