Hi Fredrik,
Thanks! It looks good to me.
Regards,
SAM
On 09.01.2013 16:07, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
2013/1/9 Sergey Malenkov :
First, *BeanInfo classes must be packed to dt.jar, not rt.jar. So, it will
be strange to provide sources for nonexistent (by default) classes.
Second, *BeanInfo java f
2013/1/9 Sergey Malenkov :
> First, *BeanInfo classes must be packed to dt.jar, not rt.jar. So, it will
> be strange to provide sources for nonexistent (by default) classes.
> Second, *BeanInfo java files are generated automatically. They are not
> well-formatted and well-documented.
Ok, I have up
Hi Fredrik,
> It seems to be reasonable that these sources should be part of the
> src.zip and that it was a bug previously that they were not.
I don't think so.
First, *BeanInfo classes must be packed to dt.jar, not rt.jar. So, it
will be strange to provide sources for nonexistent (by default)
2012/12/18 Sergey Malenkov :
> Looks OK to me. But there are a lot of images in the
> make/tools/swing-beans/beaninfo/images folder. Could you please check the
> make/javax/swing/beaninfo/SwingBeans.gmk file to ensure that the dt.jar
> library will be packed correctly?
Yes, I have verified that
On 07/01/2013 13:57, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
:
The makefile comments, comment on the fact that Java sources that
reside inside make/tools
are in fact part of the dt.jar (ie part of the jdk, not just a tool).
However this is not that easy to fix, since the actual tool that
generates the swing cla
2012/12/16 Kelly O'Hair :
> Looks ok to me. But do the makefile comments need to be adjusted?
The makefile comments, comment on the fact that Java sources that
reside inside make/tools
are in fact part of the dt.jar (ie part of the jdk, not just a tool).
However this is not that easy to fix, sin
Hi Fredrik,
Looks OK to me. But there are a lot of images in the
make/tools/swing-beans/beaninfo/images folder. Could you please check
the make/javax/swing/beaninfo/SwingBeans.gmk file to ensure that the
dt.jar library will be packed correctly?
Also I think that moving of java files from t
Looks ok to me. But do the makefile comments need to be adjusted?
-kto
On Dec 15, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
> A few source files, coming from the generated swing BeanInfo files are
> generated and stored into the wrong source directory, where the path does not
> correspond to
A few source files, coming from the generated swing BeanInfo files are
generated and stored into the wrong source directory, where the path does not
correspond to the expected package path. This is unfortunate and makes it
impossible for the smart javac wrapper to predict which source files bel
