Andrew Haley wrote:
We are not in a position to dictate to a user exactly which version of
JIBX will be installed on their system. Therefore, if JIBX is now a
dependency of OpenJDK we'll have to find a way to make OpenJDK work
with whatever versions of JIBX people choose.
To make it clear:
Hi,
and don't like the idea of being able to disable Nimbus
because of this dependency.
Too many negations and ablebables for my parser... Oops. ;-)
/Roman
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org
aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH
On 5/15/2009 5:48 PM Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK requires
0.9.5.
I don't experience any problems
2009/5/15 Anthony Petrov anthony.pet...@sun.com:
On 5/15/2009 5:48 PM Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave
up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-(
-- Jon
On May 15, 2009, at 7:13 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@... writes:
I was getting problems in the extensions (forest, I think was
Oh, and if we have somehow become dependent upon a third-party tool
(JIBX) that's so difficult to locate and has such a low commitment to
interface stability, then perhaps we should reconsider that and use a
different tool.
The decision to remove this tool from the version control, yet still
Il giorno ven, 15/05/2009 alle 15.33 +0200, Roman Kennke ha scritto:
Hi,
and don't like the idea of being able to disable Nimbus
because of this dependency.
Too many negations and ablebables for my parser... Oops. ;-)
/Roman
Argh :)
I mean, disabling it for testing is one thing, but
What OS gave you problems?
I know TortoiseHG on Windows had problems with the notify extension, but
they tend to turn on every extension on the planet by default.
-kto
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave up
and downloaded and went back
OK, it helps to know it might work. Having spent a while fighting
issues, I was getting
withdrawal symptoms from my jigsaw puzzle, and just wanted something
to work ;-)
-- Jon
On May 15, 2009, at 8:09 AM, Mark Reinhold wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700
From:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK requires
0.9.5.
The point being that if people need version X of
On May 15, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu
9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
That is disturbing.
You get a dependency error -- this was on Ubuntu 9.04,
2009/5/15 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700
From: jonathan.gibb...@sun.com
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave
up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-(
Odd. I've been hacking on Jigsaw using hg 1.1.2 on my Ubuntu
2009/5/15 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK requires
0.9.5.
The
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700
From: jonathan.gibb...@sun.com
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave
up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-(
Odd. I've been hacking on Jigsaw using hg 1.1.2 on my Ubuntu 9.04 box,
with
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:19:47 +0400
From: peter.zheleznia...@sun.com
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700
From: jonathan.gibb...@sun.com
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave
up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-(
Mine was definitely an upgrade (from 8.10) but I tried completely
removing and reinstalling the mercurial package, and that didn't
help. Currently, dpkg --configure -a continues to report a Mercurial
problem.
-- Jon
On May 15, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Peter Zhelezniakov wrote:
Mark Reinhold
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
That is disturbing.
You get a dependency error --
17 matches
Mail list logo