On 7/09/2012 11:15 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
On 6/09/2012 1:00 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already
handle
stripping, etc. themselves so we've been setting
STRIP_POLICY=no_st
- Original Message -
> Andrew,
>
> On 6/09/2012 1:00 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Interesting point.
> >>
> >> Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
> >>
> >
> > Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already
On 6/09/2012 12:00 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 9/5/12 4:46 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
Not ruffled. Just very tired of FDS.
Understood. Thanks for your patience and forbearance. :)
If the libraries are removed from the image, then that sa
Andrew,
On 6/09/2012 1:00 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already handle
stripping, etc. themselves so we've been setting STRIP
- Original Message -
> Interesting point.
>
> Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
>
Specifically talking about packaging, distro build systems already handle
stripping, etc. themselves so we've been setting STRIP_POLICY=no_strip.
However, this still creates th
On 9/5/12 4:46 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
Not ruffled. Just very tired of FDS.
The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there
are no explicit rules that indicates that diz files should end up in a
JDK or JRE image. I can ac
On 09/05/2012 01:02 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Interesting point.
>
> Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
I would have thought that depended on whether this is OpenJDK or proprietary
JDK. For OpenJDK, surely the debuginfo should be in all builds. We do
want people to b
Interesting point.
Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ?
2012/9/5 David Holmes :
> Dan,
>
> Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
>
> The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there are no
> explicit rules that indicates that diz files should en
Dan,
Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers.
The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there are
no explicit rules that indicates that diz files should end up in a JDK
or JRE image. I can accept that everything should go in a full JDK
image. But a JRE is a JDK with a b
On 9/2/12 9:37 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 3/09/2012 12:47 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 9/2/12 7:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
The build will create debuginfo/diz files as requested - that's fine.
What I'm unclear about is where those files should actually appear in
our build artifac
Hi Dan,
On 3/09/2012 12:47 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 9/2/12 7:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
The build will create debuginfo/diz files as requested - that's fine.
What I'm unclear about is where those files should actually appear in
our build artifacts, specifically the jdk/jre images that
On 9/2/12 7:26 PM, David Holmes wrote:
The build will create debuginfo/diz files as requested - that's fine.
What I'm unclear about is where those files should actually appear in
our build artifacts, specifically the jdk/jre images that are created.
Internally when we create binary images RE
The build will create debuginfo/diz files as requested - that's fine.
What I'm unclear about is where those files should actually appear in
our build artifacts, specifically the jdk/jre images that are created.
Internally when we create binary images RE strips all the debuginfo/diz
files out.
13 matches
Mail list logo
