2008/12/19 Christian Thalinger :
> On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:25 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:42 +0200, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
>> > a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
>> >
>> > Namely, if y
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:25 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:42 +0200, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
> > a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
> >
> > Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:42 +0200, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
> a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
>
> Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
> runtime will be compiled and included in rt.jar. If you compile
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:15 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> This isn't Sun's rt-closed.jar, which is proprietary. This is a faked
> version which
> is part of the IcedTea build. However, on both IcedTea6 and IcedTea7 this
> only
> includes SNMP and sound stubs (and the latter should probably b
2008/10/23 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm very confused.
>
> Where did this rt-closed.jar file come from? All the jdk7 copies I have
> do not have any jdi class files in them (jdi is all open GPL sources).
> The rt-closed.jar files I have all contain only 75 class files
> (roughly half jmx
I'm very confused.
Where did this rt-closed.jar file come from? All the jdk7 copies I have
do not have any jdi class files in them (jdi is all open GPL sources).
The rt-closed.jar files I have all contain only 75 class files
(roughly half jmx/snmp and half media/sound).
The openjdk6 rt-closed.ja
2008/10/23 Daniel Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi guys,
>
> I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
> a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
>
> Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
> runtime will be compiled and included in rt.jar. If you compile
> without t
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:42 +0200, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
> a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
>
> Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
> runtime will be compiled and included in rt.jar. If you compile
Hi guys,
I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
runtime will be compiled and included in rt.jar. If you compile
without the binary plugs, the SNMP runtime will not be included.
I
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:16 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Ok, then it sounds like something is either not being built into the jars
> in bootstrap/jdk1.6.0 or they are being missing off the classpath used
> by HotSpot. IIRC, hotspot-tools.jar should include com.sun.tools.jdi.*.
The class is n
2008/10/22 Christian Thalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:08 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> Is that error from building the hotspot-tools jar? If so, you
>> probably need to add some additional packages to the list
>> in Makefile.am.
>
> It happens when building HotSpot.
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:08 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Is that error from building the hotspot-tools jar? If so, you
> probably need to add some additional packages to the list
> in Makefile.am.
It happens when building HotSpot. Strange thing is, I could get it
working for a 32-bit build
2008/10/22 Christian Thalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:54 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> Then why aren't you using IcedTea?
>
> Fair question. As I wrote in my blog[1], I have problems in building a
> 64-bit version on OpenSolaris, but I guess I would have the same pro
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:54 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Then why aren't you using IcedTea?
Fair question. As I wrote in my blog[1], I have problems in building a
64-bit version on OpenSolaris, but I guess I would have the same problem
on Linux. I'm not exactly sure where the problem is.
2008/10/22 Christian Thalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:43 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> The main show stopper would be sound support, unless
>> Gervill has now been integrated into OpenJDK7. Otherwise,
>> the jsoundhs plug is needed (or the IcedTea replacement).
>> SN
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:43 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> The main show stopper would be sound support, unless
> Gervill has now been integrated into OpenJDK7. Otherwise,
> the jsoundhs plug is needed (or the IcedTea replacement).
> SNMP would have the same status as in OpenJDK6; an optional
2008/10/22 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I filed a jdk7 version of the bug
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6672710
> Assigned it to me, but I'm not sure when I get it fixed.
>
> I seem to recall that this wasn't the only thing needing fixing
> so that the openjdk7 builds would buil
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 17:16 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I filed a jdk7 version of the bug
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6672710
> Assigned it to me, but I'm not sure when I get it fixed.
OK.
>
> I seem to recall that this wasn't the only thing needing fixing
> so that the openjdk
I filed a jdk7 version of the bug
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6672710
Assigned it to me, but I'm not sure when I get it fixed.
I seem to recall that this wasn't the only thing needing fixing
so that the openjdk7 builds would build without access to binary plugs.
(Understanding that
Hi!
Is there currently any plan to forward-port the IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS
functionality to OpenJDK7?
- Christian
20 matches
Mail list logo
