Re: i18n dev [9] RFR 8038436: Re-examine the mechanism to determine available localedata and cldrdata

2014-09-02 Thread Naoto Sato
On 8/31/14, 11:46 PM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote: Do we need availableLocalesTests() of Bug8038436.java? I think it's rather a burden to maintain the hard-coded tags in the test. I think it's worthy to have such test that have golden data in it. I don't think there would be much changes in JRE

Re: i18n dev [9] RFR 8038436: Re-examine the mechanism to determine available localedata and cldrdata

2014-09-01 Thread Masayoshi Okutsu
Do we need availableLocalesTests() of Bug8038436.java? I think it's rather a burden to maintain the hard-coded tags in the test. Otherwise, the fix looks good to me. Thanks, Masayoshi On 8/30/2014 6:07 AM, Naoto Sato wrote: I incorporated the suggestions from Mandy and Alan. Also one change

Re: i18n dev [9] RFR 8038436: Re-examine the mechanism to determine available localedata and cldrdata

2014-08-25 Thread Masayoshi Okutsu
Here are my comments. - Looks like this change removed the 8055088 fix for BreakIteratorInfo optimization. - The langtags field in each *Impl class should be volatile. - DateFormatProviderImpl has static langtags to be shared by some other *Impl. But JRE and CLDR have different sets of