Hi Kelly and Jon-
It's fine with me to have those left in there - I just wanted to be
sure that they weren't a sign of some other badness in the zip file.
Thanks for your help!
Dan
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those are files used by Mercurial, and
Those are files used by Mercurial, and are actually managed files
in the repositories.
I could exclude them, but then I have to go down that slippery
slope of dealing with what files get filtered from the open source
bundles and which don't.
So unless these files are extremely objectionable, I'd
Dan,
Those files look reasonable, from a Mercurial perspective. I thought we
were worried
about files with weird names in the langtools repository, such as
openjdk/langtools/.hgignore#1 - add default change (text)
openjdk//langtools/.hgtags#1 - add default change (text)
Argua
Hi Jon-
Here's what I get when I unzip the b28 build:
find . -name .hg\*
./openjdk/.hgignore
./openjdk/.hgtags
./openjdk/corba/.hgignore
./openjdk/corba/.hgtags
./openjdk/hotspot/.hgignore
./openjdk/hotspot/.hgtags
./openjdk/jaxp/.hgignore
./openjdk/jaxp/.hgtags
./openjdk/jaxws/.hgignore
./openj
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Dan Grove wrote:
In addition, it seems that there's some new stuff that's been left in
the tarball like this:
openjdk/langtools/.hgignore#1 - add default change (text)
openjdk//langtools/.hgtags#1 - add default change (text)
openjdk//langtools/.jcheck/conf#1 - add defau
Dan Grove wrote:
Hi-
In the b28 drop, I see that the directory structure of the tarball
changed to have everything under openjdk. In previous releases,
hotspot & friends were all at the top level of the zip file, and now
they're under openjdk. Will future releases maintain this new
structure?
Hi-
In the b28 drop, I see that the directory structure of the tarball
changed to have everything under openjdk. In previous releases,
hotspot & friends were all at the top level of the zip file, and now
they're under openjdk. Will future releases maintain this new
structure?
In addition, it see