On 05/16/2013 12:12 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Staffan.
> Try this version: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/forest.py
> I update forest extension a little bit to work with mercurial 2.3+.
> ps: It was my first code on python.
For mercurial 2.3, maybe try this:
https://bitbucket.org/gxti/hgf
Thanks!
Can you contribute it to the version at
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/hgforest ?
/Staffan
On 16 maj 2013, at 18:12, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Staffan.
> Try this version: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/forest.py
> I update forest extension a little bit to work with mercurial 2.
Hi, Staffan.
Try this version: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/forest.py
I update forest extension a little bit to work with mercurial 2.3+.
ps: It was my first code on python.
Mercurial 2.3 seems to have changed quite a bit on the inside. I spent an hour
or so (without knowing anything about
Yep, had that done already, I'll link to your blog post for the Adopt
OpenJDK build - Thanks! Martijn
On 3 September 2012 12:18, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On 8/12/12 1:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
>> (I'm 2.3
On 8/12/12 1:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
2.2.3 works fine for me. See http://robilad.livejournal.com/125607.html
for how to do it on MacPorts, assuming you've had it installed from
On 13 aug 2012, at 18:05, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:39:57PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
>> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
>
> I am at 2.2.3. The hgforest extension as maintained at
> http://icedtea.cla
Il giorno 11/ago/2012, alle ore 18:04, Martijn Verburg
ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that
> the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat.
>
> In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible, we're
> looking to util
Hi Mark,
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:39:57PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
>> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
>
> I am at 2.2.3. The hgforest extension as maintained at
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/hgforest
> (which is a merg
Hi Chris,
> Martin,
>
> Unless you have changes that span multiple repositories, then it can be
> quite straight forward to run webrev ( without '-f ) on just the individual
> repository that you are changing. It will run with simply 'hg out'.
That did seem to work, thanks.
> If you have changes
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:39:57PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
I am at 2.2.3. The hgforest extension as maintained at
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/hgforest
(which is a merge of various hgforest
Reverting to 2.2.1 seems to have fixed things for me.
But I tend not to use the -f option with webrev anyway.
David
On 13/08/2012 7:49 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 12/08/2012 9:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
(I'm 2.3 at the mo
Martin,
Unless you have changes that span multiple repositories, then it can be
quite straight forward to run webrev ( without '-f ) on just the
individual repository that you are changing. It will run with simply 'hg
out'.
If you have changes in multiple repo's then you have other choices:
On 12/08/2012 9:39 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
(I'm 2.3 at the moment).
Unfortunately no. I just hit this myself with 2.3:
> hg --version
*** failed to import extension hgext.forest from ~/hg/forest.py:
'module' object has
Hi David,
Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
(I'm 2.3 at the moment).
Cheers,
Martijn
On 12 August 2012 12:29, David Holmes wrote:
> I had thought that webrev only tried to operate on a forest if you asked it
> to - and that that requires the forest extension
Hi Dmitry,
It reports Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 2.3)
Cheers,
Martijn
On 12 August 2012 12:14, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Martijn,
>
> What version of HG do you use?
>
> hg --version
>
>
> Can't help much with mac os, but the problem is somewhere in
> python/hg/forest ...
>
> -Dmitry
>
>
I had thought that webrev only tried to operate on a forest if you asked
it to - and that that requires the forest extension.
That said the forest extension is not working with recent mercurial
versions. :(
David
On 12/08/2012 2:04 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies if these are
Martijn,
What version of HG do you use?
hg --version
Can't help much with mac os, but the problem is somewhere in
python/hg/forest ...
-Dmitry
On 2012-08-12 15:09, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I put your version of forest.py into my /Users/karianna/.hgext/
> directory and I've alt
Hi Dmitry,
I put your version of forest.py into my /Users/karianna/.hgext/
directory and I've altered my .hgrc file is as follows:
ui.username=karianna
[extensions]
forest=/Users/karianna/.hgext/forest.py
[format]
usefncache=no
Unfortunately I still get the same error. I am running on Mac OS X
(
Martijn,
First step - you need to make
hg st
in your workspace working without extra warning
It looks like something still wrong with your forest extension.
I attached working one and below is two relevant lines from
my ~/.hgrc
[extensions]
forest=/home/dms/.hgext/forest.py
[format]
usefncache
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the hints! After following the forest extension install
instructions at
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u4/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#hg
and running "ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -N" I get:
*** failed to import extension forest from forest_extension/forest.py:
No
Martin,
1. Make sure you have a forest extension
2. Try webrev -N to create webrev against your current workspace rather
than against remote repository
-Dmitry
On 2012-08-11 20:04, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that
> th
Hi all,
Apologies if these are the wrong mailing lists, but I'm assuming that
the webrev tool falls under this domain somewhat.
In order to get patches into the OpenJDK as cleanly as possible, we're
looking to utilise webrev (since it's the std and all).
Running "ksh ./make/scripts/webrev.ksh -f
22 matches
Mail list logo
