Hi,
some days ago I dwonloaded the OpenJDK6 sources from
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/ and tried to compile it on my
Windows XP. Well, I succeeded finally but I found a bug in
~/jdk/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk. There "NAWK=$(NAWK)" should be
changed to "NAWK="$(NAWK)"". Otherwise I get
Changeset: ecb7723aaa7c
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-04-01 04:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/ecb7723aaa7c
6824595: OpenJDK fix breaks product build for jdk7
Reviewed-by: xdono, ohair
! make/Makefile
Changeset: 4264c2fe6649
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/4264c2fe6649
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset 0f0189d55ce4
! .hgtags
Changeset: c235f4a8559d
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-27 14:11 -0700
URL: http://hg.ope
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
So, we're going to have a serious attempt to minimize the number
Changeset: bec82237d694
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/bec82237d694
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset 3eb8f1047a74
! .hgtags
Changeset: 126389a38e7d
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-03-23 17:43 -0700
URL: http://
Changeset: 1b1e8f1a4fe8
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/1b1e8f1a4fe8
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset 2581d90c6c9b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 6e56a851ccaa
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-27 14:11 -0700
URL: http:
2009/4/1 Andrew Haley :
> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
> been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
> pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
> OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
>
> So, we're going to have a seri
Changeset: 69ad87dc25cb
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxp/rev/69ad87dc25cb
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset ae890d80d5df
! .hgtags
Changeset: 30e3f9614f07
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-27 14:11 -0700
URL: http://h
Changeset: e646890d18b7
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/e646890d18b7
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset 41a66a42791b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2c10f0cbb34e
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-27 14:11 -0700
URL: http://
Changeset: bcbeadb4a5d7
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/bcbeadb4a5d7
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset fea0898259ae
! .hgtags
Changeset: e1064300e0f6
Author:mchung
Date: 2009-03-12 10:27 -0700
URL: http://h
Changeset: 29329051d483
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-03-19 13:25 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/29329051d483
Added tag jdk7-b51 for changeset 8c55d5b0ed71
! .hgtags
Changeset: 889ec3ddc91b
Author:tbell
Date: 2009-03-17 11:28 -0700
URL: htt
I'll get it.
Can someone in the OpenJDK commit list (http://db.openjdk.java.net/people)
review this minor change for jdk6:
diff --git a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk b/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
--- a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
+++ b/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ RESOURCE
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
So, we're going to have a serious attempt t
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'll get it.
Can someone in the OpenJDK commit list
(http://db.openjdk.java.net/people)
review this minor change for jdk6:
Approved.
-Joe
diff --git a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
b/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
--- a/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk
+++ b/make/java/j
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
So, we're going to have a serious attempt t
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
>> been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
>> pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
>> OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
>>
>>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
>>
>> I can certainly help out with any build related (makefiles etc.)
>> changes.
>
> Good, because to my knowledge, those form the majority :)
> However, my guess would also be that some require extensive reworking
> to be generally acceptable
2009/4/1 Andrew John Hughes :
> 2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
>>> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
>>> been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
>>> pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
2009/4/1 Andrew Haley :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
>>>
>>> I can certainly help out with any build related (makefiles etc.)
>>> changes.
>>
>> Good, because to my knowledge, those form the majority :)
>> However, my guess would also be that some require extensive reworki
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 10:47 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I can certainly help out with any build related (makefiles etc.)
> changes.
Ohh, that reminds me of this one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100011
Because one change touches a jdk Makefile, I didn't push yet. Either
someon
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 10:47 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I can certainly help out with any build related (makefiles etc.)
changes.
Ohh, that reminds me of this one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100011
Because one change touches a jdk Makefile, I did
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/1 Andrew John Hughes :
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been co
Georg Koppen wrote:
There "NAWK=$(NAWK)" should be
changed to "NAWK="$(NAWK)"". Otherwise I get an error during compiling
like "/bin/sh -v command not found".
Kelly - thanks for filing 6824976 "Fix NAWK assignment in shell script
jdk/make/java/java/genlocales.gmk"
It should be visible in a
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/4/1 Andrew John Hughes :
>>>
>>> 2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
> been getting large, with some local patches that should hav
Changeset: a2033addca67
Author:ohair
Date: 2009-04-01 16:49 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/a2033addca67
6825175: Remove or disable sanity check on binary plugs
Reviewed-by: xdono
! make/common/shared/Sanity.gmk
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 11:33 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> The changes to the jdk files look fine.
> One question though, does the name "CORE_BUILD" have a meaning to the
> JDK, or just the VM? Just wondering if a "VM_CORE_BUILD" or
> "HOTSPOT_CORE_BUILD" might be a better name. Not a big deal.
I do
26 matches
Mail list logo
