Hello Volker,
I like this solution, even if it could be viewed as a bit of overkill.
/Erik
On 2013-11-14 17:35, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to solve "8026964: Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires
special settings for BOOT_RTJAR"
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026964) a
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:32 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
>
> On 15/11/2013 2:35 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to solve "8026964: Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires
>> special settings for BOOT_RTJAR"
>> (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026964) and
Hi all ,
Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I
would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps.
I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall
improvement in the usability - especially for the newbie user/builder
such as myself.
PFA a web
On 15/11/2013 15:32, Dave Pointon wrote:
Hi all ,
Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I
would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps.
I believe, as I said in the bug, that this would lead to an overall
improvement in the usability - especially for the new
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 15:47 +, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 15/11/2013 15:32, Dave Pointon wrote:
> > Hi all ,
> >
> > Having encountered the above and implemented a/the trivial solution, I
> > would appreciate your guidance as to the next steps.
> >
> > I believe, as I said in the bug, that this w
On 15/11/2013 16:03, Dave Pointon wrote:
:
TFT Alan ,
I have to admit that I thought that I'd created therein - the
description for the Product/Category was 'Java Platform Standard Edition
(JDK/JRE)', so I thought that would do it.
When you submit an incident to bugs.sun.com then it gets route
Hi,
could you please review the following small webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8026964/
It not only fixes bug 8026964 on AIX, but is changes the general way
of how to compute BOOT_RTJAR.
With the new solution, BOOT_RTJAR is computed right from the system
property 'sun.boot.
Hi Erik,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
> Hello Volker,
>
> I like this solution, even if it could be viewed as a bit of overkill.
>
thanks:)
I've just posted a RFR to the build-dev list:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-November/011108.html
with tw
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 16:15 +, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 15/11/2013 16:03, Dave Pointon wrote:
> > :
> > TFT Alan ,
> >
> > I have to admit that I thought that I'd created therein - the
> > description for the Product/Category was 'Java Platform Standard Edition
> > (JDK/JRE)', so I thought tha
On 15/11/2013 8:36 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:32 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Volker,
On 15/11/2013 2:35 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to solve "8026964: Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires
special settings for BOOT_RTJAR"
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.n
Hi Volker,
The name BOOT_RTJAR seems no longer appropriate.
Cheers,
David
On 16/11/2013 2:23 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
could you please review the following small webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/8026964/
It not only fixes bug 8026964 on AIX, but is changes the genera
Hi
I am trying to fix the following error
$ make sanity
jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk:563: *** "ERROR: Trouble with the absolute path
for OUTPUTDIR './bui
ld/windows-i586'". Stop.
and found the following code in jdk/make/common/shared/Defs-windows.gmk, line
109
define FullPath
$(if $(wor
Hi Volker,
One thing I notieced,
BOOT_RTJAR=`$BOOT_JDK/bin/java -XshowSettings 2>&1 ...
I suggest using java -XshowSettings:props -version 2>&1 .
props, will narrow down the reporting to only properties section, which is
really what you want
-version, will allow the launcher to
Hi Kumar,
thanks, that's a good point. I'll incorporate the changes into the webrev.
Regards,
Volker
On Friday, November 15, 2013, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Hi Volker,
>
> One thing I notieced,
>
> BOOT_RTJAR=`$BOOT_JDK/bin/java -XshowSettings 2>&1 ...
>
> I suggest using java -XshowSetti
On Friday, November 15, 2013, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> The name BOOT_RTJAR seems no longer appropriate.
Hi Dave,
in general, I agree, but that would be a much bigger change.
We would have to change multiple repositories (root, jdk, closed???)
simultaneously.
Do you really want tha
On 16/11/2013 5:11 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Friday, November 15, 2013, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Volker,
The name BOOT_RTJAR seems no longer appropriate.
Hi Dave,
in general, I agree, but that would be a much bigger change.
We would have to change multiple repositories (root, jdk, c
16 matches
Mail list logo
