> While porting [JDK-8224974](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224974)
> to Graal, I noticed that new CPU features were defined for x86 and AArch64
> without being exposed via JVMCI. To avoid this problem in future, this PR
> updates x86 and AArch64 to define CPU features with a single
> While porting [JDK-8224974](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224974)
> to Graal, I noticed that new CPU features were defined for x86 and AArch64
> without being exposed via JVMCI. To avoid this problem in future, this PR
> updates x86 and AArch64 to define CPU features with a single
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 07:20:21 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With JDK 16 having gone GA about a month ago it's time to bump the minimum
> boot JDK version for mainline/JDK 17.
>
> Testing: tier1-5.
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:17:14 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> This PR removes the mx configuration files in the JDK as they do not really
>> belong here. Instead, I've updated and moved them to
>> https://github.com/dougxc/mx_jdk.
>
> Doug Simon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and pre
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:58:27 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Oracle is updating the minor version of Visual Studio for building the JDK to
> 16.9.3.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b14e0ee4
Author:Erik Joelsson
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/b14e0ee4
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:17:14 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> This PR removes the mx configuration files in the JDK as they do not really
>> belong here. Instead, I've updated and moved them to
>> https://github.com/dougxc/mx_jdk.
>
> Doug Simon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and pre
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:37:08 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
> This PR removes the mx configuration files in the JDK as they do not really
> belong here. Instead, I've updated and moved them to
> https://github.com/dougxc/mx_jdk.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 54cb388d
Author:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 07:32:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> This PR removes the mx configuration files in the JDK as they do not really
>> belong here. Instead, I've updated and moved them to
>> https://github.com/dougxc/mx_jdk.
>
> Are you sure it make sense to have this dev config in the openjdk
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:46:17 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> While porting
>> [JDK-8224974](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224974) to Graal, I
>> noticed that new CPU features were defined for x86 and AArch64 without being
>> exposed via JVMCI. To avoid this problem in future, this PR upd
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:57:37 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Doug Simon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one
>> new com
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:58:46 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Doug Simon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one
>> new com
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:00:09 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Doug Simon has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences
>> compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one
>> new com
> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK to 10.3.
>
> In addition to the version bump, I'm also enabling cross compilation OOTB
> using jib from a linux-aarch64 to linux-x64 binaries, which was the last
> missing combination. (Native x64, native aarch64, cross from x64 to aar
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:21:11 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK to 10.3.
>
> In addition to the version bump, I'm also enabling cross compilation OOTB
> using jib from a linux-aarch64 to linux-x64 binaries, which was the last
> missing combin
> While porting [JDK-8224974](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224974)
> to Graal, I noticed that new CPU features were defined for x86 and AArch64
> without being exposed via JVMCI. To avoid this problem in future, this PR
> updates x86 and AArch64 to define CPU features with a single
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:38:52 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/vmStructs_x86.hpp line 45:
>>
>>> 43:
>>> 44: #define DECLARE_LONG_CPU_FEATURE_CONSTANT(id, name, bit)
>>> GENERATE_VM_LONG_CONSTANT_ENTRY(VM_Version::CPU_##id)
>>> 45: #define VM_LONG_CPU_FEATURE_CONSTANTS
>>> CPU_FEA
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:56:45 GMT, Doug Simon wrote:
>> While porting
>> [JDK-8224974](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224974) to Graal, I
>> noticed that new CPU features were defined for x86 and AArch64 without being
>> exposed via JVMCI. To avoid this problem in future, this PR upd
17 matches
Mail list logo
