In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is not currently
working although I am able to do a full 32 bit build. I've recently
moved from XP to W7 so my environment might not be set up quite right
yet. Here's what I do...
// These are done in a bat file before I do any makes
set ALT
Adding ALT_OUTPUTDIR didn't help, e.g.
make ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 FASTDEBUG=true
ALT_OUTPUTDIR=C:/OpenJDK/jdk8/build/windows-i586-debug 2>&1 | tee build.log
On 1/23/12 9:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is not currently
> working
va/awt and repeatedly
> cd /cygdrive/c/OpenJDK/jdk8/jdk/make/java/awt/
> make ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 FASTDEBUG=true 2>&1 | tee build.log
>
> -kto
>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is n
true instead of the fastdebug_build target at the top level.
Then I'll experiment and see if I need to rebuild at the .../jdk/make
level first and then at the .../jdk/make/java/awt level as I need rebuilds.
Pete
On 1/23/12 9:13 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi Kelly, That's almost what I
Is anyone able to build on Win 7? I'm on my 8th build hoping to get to
the end and have seen these errors:
out of memory, 3 times - I have more than enough memory
fork: Resource temporarily unavailable, 3 times
error 126, once
I have read http://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.bloda so
ap
1-WOW64 WDFN00299915A 1.7.9(0.237/5/3) 2011-03-29 10:10 i686
> Cygwin
> bash 4.1.10(4) // installed by Cygwin setup.exe
> make 3.82 // compiled by myself
>
> In the Virtual box VM I have the following system:
>
> 64-bit Windows XP Professional Version 2003 SP 2
>
> Cy
:55 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Thanks Volker, I was thinking I'm going to have to try using XP in a
> VM. My W7 config is very close to yours (make 3.81 instead of 3.82).
>
> W7 Pro, 64 bit, SP1
> Intel Core 2 Duo, P8700, 2.53 GHz, 8 GB RAM
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Bevo 1.7.9(0.23
so maybe it's
> just a matter of time. ;^(
>
> Someone with some strong Windows experience needs to run this to ground.
> We do need this to work, eventually.
>
> -kto
>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> I started W7 in safe mode and the build fail
, i.e. .../jdk8
Pete
> then you can go into make/java/awt and repeatedly
> cd /cygdrive/c/OpenJDK/jdk8/jdk/make/java/awt/
> make ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 FASTDEBUG=true 2>&1 | tee build.log
>
> -kto
>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> In the past I
I just did the following:
sh ./get_source.sh
and got this:
# cd ./jdk && hg pull -u
pulling from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8//jdk
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 563 changesets with 3123 changes to 2661 files (+1 heads)
not updating: cro
have a problem applying a patch to fresh clone I
was able to fix them. -Pete
On 1/30/12 8:56 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Pete,
>
> On 31/01/2012 12:45 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I just did the following:
>> sh ./get_source.sh
>>
>> and got this:
>
Thanks David, I did the following and with a simple 3 way merge fix on
one file I'm now back in sync.
cd ...\jdk
hg merge
Pete
On 1/30/12 11:01 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 31/01/2012 2:50 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi David, It might help to know that I had pulled the code back i
Back in November there was a change to ...\jdk\make\docs\Makefile to fix
an out of memory problem by raising the memory size for a 32 bit build
(line 74) from 512 to 612. That didn't work on my machine: 64 bit
Windows 7 with 8 mb. I raised it up to 1024 to bypass the problem. I
don't know if tha
What is the difference between using a target of fastdebug_build and no
target but using the variable FASTDEBUG=true?
ke.org/files/cygwin/make.exe-cygwin1.7
but I have not tried it. I just downloaded it and it's also version
3.8.1. It might be worth a try.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I just had success with the fol
After editing JLabel.java, deleting my build directory, and starting a
full build I am getting
make[5]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/OpenJDK/jdk8/jdk/make/javax/swing'
make[5]: *** No rule to make target `javax/swing/JLabel', needed by
`C:/OpenJDK/jdk8/build/windows-i586/../windows-i586-fastde
The problem was caused by the existence of
...\jdk\src\share\classes\javax\swing\JLabel - Copy.java. (This is
Windows' scheme for copies.)
Original Message
Subject:unable to build JLabel
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:27:58 -0600
From: Pete Brunet
Rep
On 2/1/12 10:54 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> On 1/23/12 9:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is not currently
>> working although I am able to do a full 32 bit build. I've recently
>> moved from XP to W7 so my environment
;t need wbem in my path; I'll remove it the next
time I do a build.
Pete
On 2/2/12 2:19 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> On 2/1/12 10:54 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> On 1/23/12 9:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is not currently
>
On 1/23/12 9:39 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> In the past I was able to build part of jdk 8 but that is not currently
> working although I am able to do a full 32 bit build. I've recently
> moved from XP to W7 so my environment might not be set up quite right
> yet. Here's wha
On 2/13/12 1:35 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Just a few comments below...
>
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> This worked for me today for building just awt:
>>
>> This is in my bat file. The first two sets are what resolved my issue.
>>
bed in the history below) a new directory, obj, is added and
populated.
On 2/13/12 3:13 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/12 1:35 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> Just a few comments below...
>>>
>>> On
s
> separate, since there is no guarantee that these can be mixed together and
> work.
> All compilations for a library need to be the same kind of compilation.
>
> -kto
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> I don't know if this is
On 2/15/12 11:33 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kelly, That's interesting. That might provide a hint regarding a
>> problem I am working on. When I do a full fastdebug_build build with my
>> patch applied
On 2/20/12 1:25 PM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
> Den måndagen den 20:e februari 2012 skrev Pete
>
> >
> > A fastdebug build is a combination of the variables VARIANT=DBG
> and FASTDEBUG=true
> > but it's been a long time since I looked at that. Proof is in
> the pudding. Good Luck
I get different versions when I do the following. Why?
Win 7 DOS prompt: \Windows\System32\java -version
Cygwin prompt: /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32/java -version
Is that java.exe a stub that routes to a different java.exe? How do I
control which java is activated?
ive/c/Windows/System32/java -version
Original Message
Subject:java -version different on Win vs Cygwin
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:30:45 -0500
From: Pete Brunet
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: build-dev
I get different versions when I do the foll
Should the 64 bit Win installer also install the 32 bit program? If not
it would be good to put a warning on download page.
Original Message
Subject:Fwd: java -version different on Win vs Cygwin
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:49:43 -0500
From: Pete Brunet
Reply-To
When using hg commands I always get:
*** failed to import extension defpath from
C:\Users\Pete\hg-extensions\defpath\defpath.py: No module named HTMLParser
I am using cygwin 1.7.0 (instead of the latest due to needing to run on
Windows 7).
I tried adding the following to my environment variables
Thanks for the feedback Tim.
On 6/16/12 12:32 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> On 06/16/12 09:36, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> When using hg commands I always get:
>>
>> *** failed to import extension defpath from
>> C:\Users\Pete\hg-extensions\defpath\defpath.py: No module named
>
Hi I pulled this morning and jcheck aborted my pull -u because of
invalid bug IDs for
changeset 5413: bugid 8002040, author dholmes
changeset 5490: bugid 8000989, author twisti
I was able to pull -u over the last week or two. Am I doing something
wrong?
Pete
In the incoming changesets those are the only two with IDs above 80.
Also I forgot to indicate that the repo is
hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk
Pete
On 11/14/12 9:53 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi I pulled this morning and jcheck aborted my pull -u because of
> invalid bug I
I looked in jcheck.py and see:
if not (bs[0] in ['1','2','4','5','6','7']):
ch.error(ctx, "Invalid bugid: %s" % bs)
so either I don't have the latest or '8' needs to be added. I'll try that.
Pe
I recloned hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk today and the build
failed as follows:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Users/Pete/JDK7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/make/com/sun/jmx'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p
../../../../build/windows-i586/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi
rm -f
../../../../build/windows-i
I did my first clone/build of jdk8 today and the build failed with...
make[3]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Users/Pete/JDK8/swing/jdk/make/java/redist/sajdi'
ASSEMBLY_IMPORT: ../../../../build/windows-i586/lib/sa-jdi.jar
/usr/bin/mkdir -p ../../../../build/windows-i586/lib
rm -f ../../../../bu
lt is 1 and I can't see
> any obvious way it would change implicitly. The import jdk you are
> using had it set to 1 and the import logic expects this setting to
> match in order to find the files to import.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-11-15 02:53, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I d
s triggered. Somewhere in your log, the state of this
> variable should be printed like this:
>
> INFO: ZIP_DEBUGINFO_FILES=1
>
> Could you see what it says? Or paste that whole section of INFO:?
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-11-15 16:05, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi Erik, I d
I noticed that it's there for make sanity:
INFO: ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1
INFO: ZIP_DEBUGINFO_FILES=1
INFO: ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1
INFO: ZIP_DEBUGINFO_FILES=1
Pete
On 11/15/12 10:07 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi Erik, I had saved my build log. There is no INFO: sectio
Erik, I'm sorry. That was bad info. I am building both 7u and 8 and
this must have been from my 7u sanity build. I tried it again on my 8
directory and there is no INFO: output.
On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I noticed that it's there for make san
ge related to this, sent to the
>> hotspot and 7u dev lists.
>>
>> On 11/14/12 21:24, David Holmes wrote:
>>> As general advice yes you need matching jdk and hotspot builds in 7u
>>> now (and 8), but this error in itself seems unrelated to invokeDynamic.
>>
&
Hi Erik, I did a build of the full forest today and all is well. -Pete
On 11/15/12 10:47 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Erik, I'm sorry. That was bad info. I am building both 7u and 8 and
> this must have been from my 7u sanity build. I tried it again on my 8
> directory and th
Hi, I built jdk8 last night and left NO_DOCS=true off but I have no docs
directory. What do I need to do? Here are the highlights of what did:
- install the import bundle from
http://jre.us.oracle.com/java/re/jdk/8.0/promoted/latest/bundles/windows-i586/jdk-8-ea-windows-i586.tar.gz
- set ALT_JDK
Thanks Erik, That worked. -Pete
On 1/18/13 9:36 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The fastdebug target in jdk/make/Makefile does not include running
> docs. The target in that makefile is 'docs', but I've never used it
> from there and can't say if it works.
>
>
I just ran hg status on a newly cloned jdk8 jdk directory and everything
is listed as modified. I don't know if I did something wrong or
something else is broken. Here's what I did:
- install the import bundle from
http://jre.us.oracle.com/java/re/jdk/8.0/promoted/latest/bundles/windows-i586/jdk
I diffed one of the files:
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
While I've occasionally run into mode differences before on files I've
changed I haven't seen this problem on every file. I'm running cygwig
on Win 7.
Pete
On 1/18/13 11:23 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I just r
status runs clean.
cding to directories fails and would require more 755s on dirs you want
to cd too but Win Explorer doesn't complain.
Pete
On 1/18/13 11:34 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I diffed one of the files:
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
>
> While I've o
xplorer?).
>
> I don't have a reference handy, but some searching should be able to
> uncover the email threads in archives of build-dev or
> [email protected]
>
> My solution is to eschew the Windows GUI and use the command line,
> just as you would on any o
This issue may have been due to using hg clone from the dos prompt
instead of the cygwin prompt. I cloned again from the cygwin prompt and
now hg status doesn't indicate any modified files. -Pete
On 1/18/13 1:42 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi Tim, I did the whole process from the cygwin
Hi I have VS 2010 and need to build JDK6. Using my typical JDK7 set up
with VS 2010 make sanity reports
../make/common/shared/Compiler-msvc.gmk:129 *** COMPILER_PATH cannot be
empty here. Stop.
Do I need to install an older compiler (and if so where would I get it)?
Pete
On 2/7/13 2:59 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> On 02/07/13 12:18, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi I have VS 2010 and need to build JDK6. Using my typical JDK7 set up
>> with VS 2010 make sanity reports
>>
>> ../make/common/shared/Compiler-msvc.gmk:129 *** COMPILER_PATH cannot be
>
I ran into two new problems building JFX on Win 7 this week:
1) I had to unset lowercase tmp and temp. Apparently there is a new
problem with having duplicates, TMP/tmp and TEMP/temp. This may be
related to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=13131
The failure appeared as:
launc
> http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-27210
>
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
> On 2/15/2013 0:32, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I ran into two new problems building JFX on Win 7 this week:
>>
>> 1) I had to unset lowercase tmp and temp. Apparently there is a new
I'm seeing this when using -Dbuild.debug (and Norton 360 auto-protect
off). I may have not seen it a non-debug build.
On 2/15/13 9:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Another one I've see is:
>
> ...
> run-vs-property-generator:
> [echo] Using
> C:\Users\Pete\J
What is causing this? I am in .../controls/jfx but the build is running
from .../controls-old3.
$ pwd
/Users/petebrunet/JavaFX/controls/jfx
$ ant -Dhudson.jfx.job.name=8.0-controls-scrum sdk-no-docs
Buildfile: /Users/petebrunet/JavaFX/controls-old3/jfx/build.xml
...
Restarting the console solved it.
On 2/22/13 11:16 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> What is causing this? I am in .../controls/jfx but the build is running
> from .../controls-old3.
>
> $ pwd
> /Users/petebrunet/JavaFX/controls/jfx
>
> $ ant -Dhudson.jfx.job.name=8.0-contr
The current clone of jfx is crashing when running the HelloButton demo.
Upgrading from 7u9 to 7u15 didn't help. Using the jfxrt.jar from 7u15
works OK, but not the one built from the cloned repo. -Pete
# EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc005)
# Problematic frame:
# V [jvm.dll+0xfb0a1]
j co
p.s. It fails on Win but not Mac.
On 2/25/13 11:01 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> The current clone of jfx is crashing when running the HelloButton demo.
> Upgrading from 7u9 to 7u15 didn't help. Using the jfxrt.jar from 7u15
> works OK, but not the one built from the clone
Another p.s. - the build/repo info...
ant -Dhudson.jfx.job.name=8.0-controls-scrum sdk-no-docs
On 2/25/13 11:26 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> p.s. It fails on Win but not Mac.
>
> On 2/25/13 11:01 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> The current clone of jfx is crashing when running the H
y contacts in the JavaFX teams? If so, please reach
>> out to them. I'm not sure how any are on the JDK build list.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>> On 2/25/13 11:01 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>>> The current clone of jfx is crashing when
f file to point at a 32 bit Java and reset the
HelloWorld project properties back to specifying the Default version of
Java. That config is working OK so this should insulate me from this
problem in the future.
Pete
On 2/25/13 3:40 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Thanks Phil, That might be a useful h
I cloned jdk7u-dev today, via get_source.sh and then built from the
jdk/make directory using:
make ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 ALLOW_DOWNLOADS=true NO_DOCS=true
The build ran a long time and then failed with:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Users/Pete/JDK7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/make/com/sun/jmx'
../../
f jdk7u on windows
> at:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/logs/NTAMD64/nightly/output-jdk7u-fastdebug.log.gz
>
> Regards
> Volker
>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:40 AM, John Rose wrote:
>> On May 3, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>
>>
be reliable because the sort shows this order, starting
with most recent: 7u40, 7u22, 7u23, 7u45, 7u18, 7u19, ...
Pete
On 5/7/13 3:13 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On May 7, 2013, at 1:59 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>
Please review the following patch which will add the code of the Java
Access Bridge (JAB) and related Java Accessibility Utilities to OpenJDK.
This code is used by Assistive Technology such as screen readers and
screen magnifiers used by those who are blind or have low vision. AT
use the JAB nati
ridge.DEF is pretty empty. I'll see if the build will work
without it.
WinAccessBridge.DEF seems like it might be needed. What do you think?
Pete
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2015-03-21 05:33, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Please review the following patch which will add the code of the
understand correctly that the code itself were not changed except
> files location?
>
> 21.03.15 7:33, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Please review the following patch which will add the code of the Java
>> Access Bridge (JAB) and related Java Accessibility Utilities to OpenJDK.
>
t and Monkey test tools which will be
the subject of a later patch
- removed the DEF files; although they were used in the build, there are
no build or runtime problems after their removal
On 3/24/15 8:08 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> On 2015-03-23 18:31, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi Erik,
On 3/24/15 3:23 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi Sergey, That's pretty much the case. I just went through the code
> and found these differences:
> - merged in JDK-8055173 (merge jawt.dll into javaaccessbridge.dll) which
> was recently pushed.
That should have been jawtaccessbridge.
ild so no
> reason to remove them.
Thanks Erik, My build and tests ran OK so apparently they are no longer
needed.
To all: My hope is to push this patch into 9 tomorrow (Thursday) so
please let me know if there are any additional issues as soon as you can.
Pete
>
> /Erik
>
> On
Hi Sergey, Which methods are you referring to? -Pete
On 3/25/15 10:16 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> The fix looks fine.
> But it is interesting, do we have an option to remove all deprecated
> methods during this opening? or can we do it later? or we cannot?
>
> 25.03.15 17:44, Pe
that its safe
> to remove that copy for closed builds anyway
>
> I think the safe thing to do is undo that change in Copy-java.gmk
> and leave the closed file in place and discuss off-line with the
> security team why the files differ ..
I'll start a discussion on this.
>
Hi, I need some help so I can build on MacOSX to fix a build break.
First since I had Xcode 6.1.1 and configure complained that I didn't
have v4 I installed v4.6.3. After installing 4.6.3 and doing
sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode\ 4.6.3.app/
I got past that. Then for some reason my comp
Please review/approve the following patch.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.01/
The recent push for JDK-8076182 caused a build break, i.e. a problem for
the creation of the Javadoc in the environment used by the nightly
build. This was because a newly opened package
com.su
ndy
>
> On 4/7/2015 10:51 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Please review/approve the following patch.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.01/
>>
>> The recent push for JDK-8076182 caused a build break, i.e. a problem for
>> the creation
David, Considering that the source should be in jdk/src/share/classes
does that change things? -Pete
>
> David
>
> On 8/04/2015 3:51 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Please review/approve the following patch.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.01/
approval.
I have started a local Win build and will start JPRT builds on Linux,
Windows, Solaris, and Mac shortly.
Thanks,
Pete
On 4/8/15 12:51 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Please review/approve the following patch.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.01/
>
> The
t will work I'll redo the patch. Let me know.
>
> -phil.
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 10:25 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Here is an updated patch.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.02/
>>
>> It simply removes the com.sun.java.accessibility.
enerated for this package on windows build.
>
> Mandy
>
> On 4/8/2015 10:29 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>> Isn't it sufficient to comment out this one line ?
>>
>> 1215 ALL_OTHER_TARGETS += jaccessdocs
>>
>> .. and add a comment as to why ?
>>
>&g
resending - too many on To:/Cc:
On 4/8/15 1:08 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I confirmed the javadoc is gone, and make docs did not fail.
>
> I have yet to submit the JPRT job.
>
> Sean/Winston do you want to wait for the 7 JPRT jobs to finish before
> you approve the push?
>
&
:
> That looks good to me.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 4/8/2015 10:55 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> How's this?
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8076552/webrev.03
>>
>> On 4/8/15 12:47 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>> I agree with Phil's suggesti
>
> Do you have a forest on nfs? (from where I can pull/clone your fixes)?
>
> - Lana
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 11:08 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I confirmed the javadoc is gone, and make docs did not fail.
>>
>> I have yet to submit the JPRT job.
>>
>&g
I added 9-na.
>
> Rule 4. Approval requests should be carried out on jdk8u-dev mailing
> list.
I did the RfA on jdk8u-dev (but am pending the start/run/success of the
7 JPRT builds).
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 08/04/2015 19:14, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> resending - too man
Starting with b58 with JAWS (screen reader) running on Win 8, when
starting SwingSet2 the splash screen appears but the application doesn't
start. There are no messages in the console. I see b58 only had one fix:
8076531 infrastructure Switch default compiler on Windows to VS2013
What might be
th VS2013
>
> Does it happen if you use javaw instead of java ?
Same behavior: splash screen, then back to the prompt.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 04/21/2015 11:53 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Starting with b58 with JAWS (screen reader) running on Win 8, when
>> starting SwingSet2 th
I was able to build 9 OK then I switched from VS2010 to VS2013 and now
get the following. I tried hg tpull -u but that didn't help.
Is there something I need to do besides installing VS Pro 2013 with
Update 4?
$ make images 2>&1 | tee make-64.log
Building target 'images' in configuration
'windo
p.s. I also had done a make reconfigure and make clean. I'll try make
clean and reconfigure from bash.
On 4/22/15 4:06 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I was able to build 9 OK then I switched from VS2010 to VS2013 and now
> get the following. I tried hg tpull -u but that didn't hel
:= -DHPROF_LOGGING, \
MAPFILE := $(JDK_TOPDIR)/make/mapfiles/libhprof/mapfile-vers, \
Pete
On 4/22/15 4:12 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> p.s. I also had done a make reconfigure and make clean. I'll try make
> clean and reconfigure from bash.
>
> On 4/22/15 4:06 PM, Pete Brunet wro
On 4/22/15 4:52 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 23/04/2015 7:06 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> I was able to build 9 OK then I switched from VS2010 to VS2013 and now
>> get the following. I tried hg tpull -u but that didn't help.
>>
>> Is there something I need to do bes
elves when this flag
is set.
Pete
On 4/21/15 3:19 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On 4/21/15 2:42 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>> Perhaps JAWS is not well behaved w.r.t multiple DLL versions ?
> Tell me more.
>> Does it happen only on win 8 ? If you boot the same system into wi
On 4/22/15 6:48 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Peter,
>
> See
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077422
>
> update 4 is not supported yet.
Hi David, Do I need to uninstall Update 4 and install Update 3? -Pete
>
> David
>
> On 23/04/2015 8:02 AM, Pete Brune
Hi Erik, It's https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/INTJDK-7615864.
On 4/22/15 8:20 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> That's an interesting find. I suppose we need to add that linker flag
> then. Do you have a bug opened for this issue?
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2015-04-22 17:56, Pete
he bug David linked, but since the removal of
> that code hasn't happened yet, I think we should propose your patch as
> a fix for that bug.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2015-04-22 18:00, David Holmes wrote:
>> On 23/04/2015 10:57 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> On 4/22/
>
> Thanks,
> Vadim
>
> On 07.04.2015 15:56, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi, I need some help so I can build on MacOSX to fix a build break.
>>
>> First since I had Xcode 6.1.1 and configure complained that I didn't
>> have v4 I installed v4.6.3. After instal
10.9 and later)
>
> Thanks,
> Vadim
>
> On 06.05.2015 15:39, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi Vadim, I had to defer from this for a while but am back at it.
>>
>> Apparently --with-xcode-path isn't currently a valid option.
>>
>> Pet
t;> On 5/6/15 7:51 AM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
>>> Hi Pete,
>>>
>>> How is that?
>>> I haven't tried this lately, but I just pulled 8u-dev sources and the
>>> option is there:
>>>
>>> $ sh configure --help
>>>
>>
After installing XQuartz, thanks to the text at Problem #1 at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-October.txt
using these options worked
--with-freetype-include=/usr/X11/include/freetype2
--with-freetype-lib=/usr/X11/lib
Pete
On 5/6/15 2:49 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Thanks Da
p.s. make images ran with no problems.
On 5/6/15 3:09 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> After installing XQuartz, thanks to the text at Problem #1 at
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-October.txt
> using these options worked
> --with-freetype-include=/usr/X11/inclu
Please review the following change for 8u:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8077296/webrev.00/
Background:
- As part of the open sourcing of the JAB and Java Accessibility
Utilities (JAU) the JAU Javadoc was setup to be added to the build.
- Due to a 8u build issue (it uses source bundles
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi, As part of my test I need to build a simple DLL and then load it
>> from my test class.
On 6/3/15 8:43 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
> paragraph below.
>
> On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> Hi, As part of my test I need to bui
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
