On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 07:47:24 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
> At default configuration, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is exported as environment
> variable in SetupReproducibleBuild. Then, gcc is affected of
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable. This value is used only to set
> SOURCE_DATE_ISO_8601 (excep
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:50:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Thank you for your comments.
>> I understood the goal of reproducible build. But now,
>> ENABLE_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD is set to false in default configuration.
>> Then I think minimize the effort of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when reproducible
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:20:21 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 19 -> JDK 20
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7039c661
Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/7039c6616ad1b67320f08e7ea4763e8ff4977430
Stats: 752 lines
> Forwardport JDK 19 -> JDK 20
Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 96 additional commits
since the last revision:
- Me
Forwardport JDK 19 -> JDK 20
-
Commit messages:
- Merge
- 8288527: broken link in java.base/java/util/zip/package-summary.html
- 8288741: JFR: Change package name of snippet files
- 8288663: JFR: Disabling the JfrThreadSampler commits only a partially
disabled state
- 8287800: J
The documentation for build performance currently points to the non-existent
--enable-sjavac flag to enable sjavac, the correct one is actually
--enable-javac-server (Finally seem to have gotten pandoc working, hopefully
the html is correct this time)
-
Commit messages:
- Correct
On Thu, 12 May 2022 08:43:56 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change to the build system which now makes
> bundled zlib as the default for macos aarch64 systems?
>
> We have been running into various intermittent failures on macos aarch64
> systems for several mont
On 6/16/22 20:00, Browser wrote:
... It did result in a runable `./build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java` / JDK,
however I no longer have confidence in the JDK generated. null pointers make me nervous,
use-after-free warnings also make me nervous! Is this something I need to worr
On 6/17/22 09:36, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 6/16/22 19:00, Browser wrote:
> That one I'll chalk up to not-yet-resolved issue with GCC 12. Mainline does
not seem to fail GCC 12
> the same way, but it does fail too.
> sh...@redhat.com:
>> Pleasing the newer compiler version is always someth
