On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
>> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>>
>> Recently, there have been users who have
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
>> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>>
>> Recently, there have been users who have
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:48:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
>> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>>
>> Recently, there have been users who have
> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>
> Recently, there have been users who have been prompted for sudo password when
> running jtreg tests
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:12:19 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> incorporate review comments
>
> doc/testing.md line 55:
>
>> 53: collecting this additional data isn't always
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:08:03 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> > > Inside Oracle, if you configure using Jib you should get the same version
> > > of pandoc that was used to generate the existing html files.
> >
> >
> > I gave that a try (and verified that it uses the jib installed pandoc), but
>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:07:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
>> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>>
>> Recently, there have been users who have
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 06:04:14 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> > Inside Oracle, if you configure using Jib you should get the same version
> > of pandoc that was used to generate the existing html files.
>
> I gave that a try (and verified that it uses the jib installed pandoc), but
> it still ends
On 8/25/22 4:11 PM, some-java-user-99206970363698485...@vodafonemail.de
wrote:
Hello,
the JDK source code contains many Java classes which are specific to one
platform / operating system, for example
classes to interact with the file system or the AWT and Swing related classes
are different
On an even closer inspection, the strip used currently on MacOS is actually
XCode strip and not the one that comes with LLVM, do we already have an
XCode check that can be piggybacked off at the moment?
best regards,
Julian
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 1:30 PM Julian Waters
wrote:
> After a quick
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:34:57 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> incorporate review comments
>
> doc/testing.md line 53:
>
>> 51: configured to allow running these commands, then it
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:44:32 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>
> Recently, there have been users who have been
> Can I please get a review of this change to the testing documentation which
> adds a note about failure handlers in jtreg? This addresses
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292911.
>
> Recently, there have been users who have been prompted for sudo password when
> running jtreg tests
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:41:52 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Inside Oracle, if you configure using Jib you should get the same version of
> pandoc that was used to generate the existing html files.
I gave that a try (and verified that it uses the jib installed pandoc), but it
still ends up
14 matches
Mail list logo
