On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
>
> This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
>
> This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:36:28 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need a code review for moving the contents of the jdk.crypto.ec module into
> java.base. This moves the SunEC JCE Provider (Elliptic Curve) into
> java.base. EC has always been separate from the base module/pkg because
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:08:34 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> We were running into some issues with the configure checks checking the
> codesign tool. Unfortunately the output is a bit limited and should be
> enhanced, especially printing what is really called.
A related question, maybe someone
We were running into some issues with the configure checks checking the
codesign tool. Unfortunately the output is a bit limited and should be
enhanced, especially printing what is really called.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8310321
Changes:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
>
> This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
>
> This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:39:21 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
>
> This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in
Can I please get a review of this change which backports the fixes for
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310259?
This wasn't a clean backport because this also brings in
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309934 which in theory isn't a must-have
change, but I think it's good to have these
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 05:46:34 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
> From what I was told, the native library was one of the reasons it was not in
> the base pkg before modularization and just remained so afterwards.
Maybe you are thinking about the size of libsunec or non-technical issues that
meant
10 matches
Mail list logo