On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:00:34 GMT, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Personally I have never used `das`/`das1` on any AArch64 port when
>> debugging. I guess it was somewhat handy when the backend was originally
>> developed. I would argue that the built-in disassembler of any debugger and
>> `disnm`
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:37 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster
wrote:
>> Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule
>> in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be
>> removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()`
>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:24:10 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This PR intends to remove the legacy `COMPAT` locale data from the JDK. The
> `COMPAT` locale data was introduced for applications' migratory purposes
> transitioning to `CLDR`. It is becoming a technical debt and now is the time
> to remov
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:20:54 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> Why not reuse the AR variable for lib rather than introduce an entirely new
> LIB variable?
The reason will become more apparent as I progress towards proper handling of
static libs. In short, AR is not by far a 1-to-1 mapping with LIB.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:24:10 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> This PR intends to remove the legacy `COMPAT` locale data from the JDK. The
> `COMPAT` locale data was introduced for applications' migratory purposes
> transitioning to `CLDR`. It is becoming a technical debt and now is the time
> to remov
