On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:59:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> @prrace I will need your assistance in confirming that my understanding about
> the AWT vs 2D split is correct. In particular, `libosxui` gave me some
> headache, but after trying to dig into the code my understanding ended up
> bei
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new
> `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option.
>
> The work can be thought of as in 3 parts:
>
> 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it
> is possible to specify the appropriately configured `Lint` object when i
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:26:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Unfortunately, after
> [JDK-8329704](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329704) AIX fails to
> build. The reason is that libjli is specially treated on AIX, and built like
> a static library. I tried to compensate for this (and ha
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:14 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review a patch to add support for Markdown syntax in documentation
>> comments, as described in the associated JEP.
>>
>> Notable features:
>>
>> * support for `///` documentation comments in `JavaTokenizer`
>> * new module `j
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:01:37 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> adjust call for `saveDanglingDocComments` for enum members
>
> The build changes look okay.
>
> Do you have
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:26:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Unfortunately, after
> [JDK-8329704](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329704) AIX fails to
> build. The reason is that libjli is specially treated on AIX, and built like
> a static library. I tried to compensate for this (and ha
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:26:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Unfortunately, after
> [JDK-8329704](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329704) AIX fails to
> build. The reason is that libjli is specially treated on AIX, and built like
> a static library. I tried to compensate for this (and ha
Unfortunately, after [JDK-8329704](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329704)
AIX fails to build. The reason is that libjli is specially treated on AIX, and
built like a static library. I tried to compensate for this (and had tested on
an earlier draft), but some late-minute changes in JDK-832
On 2024-04-02 21:16, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
Hi Magnus,
In today's zoom meeting with Alan, Ron, Liam and Chuck, we (briefly)
discussed how to move forward contributing the static Java related
changes (additional runtime fixes/enhancements on top of the existing
static support in JDK) from
https
