Re: RFR: 8303689: javac -Xlint could/should report on "dangling" doc comments [v6]

2024-04-18 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new > `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option. > > The work can be thought of as in 3 parts: > > 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it > is possible to specify the appropriately configured `Lint` object when i

Re: RFR: 8303689: javac -Xlint could/should report on "dangling" doc comments [v5]

2024-04-18 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new > `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option. > > The work can be thought of as in 3 parts: > > 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it > is possible to specify the appropriately configured `Lint` object when i

Re: RFR: 8303689: javac -Xlint could/should report on "dangling" doc comments [v4]

2024-04-18 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
> Please review the updates to support a proposed new > `-Xlint:dangling-doc-comments` option. > > The work can be thought of as in 3 parts: > > 1. An update to the `javac` internal class `DeferredLintHandler` so that it > is possible to specify the appropriately configured `Lint` object when i

Re: Questions about the Hermetic Java project

2024-04-18 Thread Julian Waters
Oops, I meant __declspec(dllexport) void exportedMethod() {} with braces, not brackets On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:27 PM Julian Waters wrote: > > I have good (and bad news) for you! > > The good news is that from memory, ld and gcc (but I assume you are > only concerned about ld) can work entirely

Re: Questions about the Hermetic Java project

2024-04-18 Thread Julian Waters
I have good (and bad news) for you! The good news is that from memory, ld and gcc (but I assume you are only concerned about ld) can work entirely on cl compiled object files with no hitch whatsoever, and partial linking is fully functional with ld on Windows! Symbol hiding also works, but with a