On Wed, 22 May 2024 08:52:42 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add a note to module-info
>
> make/modules/java.xml/Copy.gmk line 35:
>
>> 33: $(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_XM
On Fri, 24 May 2024 05:26:40 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add two sample configuration files:
>>
>> jaxp-strict.properties: used to set strict configuration, stricter than
>> jaxp.properties in previous versions such as JDK 22
>>
>>> jaxp-compat.properties: used to regain compatibility from any
> Add two sample configuration files:
>
> jaxp-strict.properties: used to set strict configuration, stricter than
> jaxp.properties in previous versions such as JDK 22
>
>> jaxp-compat.properties: used to regain compatibility from any more
>> restricted configuration than previous versions
On Thu, 23 May 2024 23:22:51 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES, removed
> in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and fix some
> spelling issues.
>
> Testing: tier1
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES, removed
in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and fix some
spelling issues.
Testing: tier1
-
Commit messages:
- 8332849: Update doc/testing.{md,html} (spelling and stale information)
Ch
On Thu, 23 May 2024 20:28:49 GMT, Matias Saavedra Silva
wrote:
>> Ioi Lam has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits
On Thu, 23 May 2024 03:35:19 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> ### Overview
>>
>> This PR archives `CONSTANT_FieldRef` entries in the _resolved_ state when
>> it's safe to do so.
>>
>> I.e., when a `CONSTANT_FieldRef` constant pool entry in class `A` refers to
>> a *non-static* field `B.F`,
>> - `B` is
On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:42:39 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Do you think you'll be able to review this next week?
Yes, I want to help you get this one over the line.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2127828050
On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:33:14 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> As seen in [JDK-8331541](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331541), if we
>> are not consistently setting all assembler directives correctly, we can get
>> errors that are not detected by the linker.
>>
>> We should stop duplica
On Thu, 16 May 2024 13:47:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> If I understand you correctly, this would be no longer a build-time only
>>> approach to produce the "linkable runtime"? It would be some-kind of
>>> jlink-option driven approach (as it would run some code that should only
>>> run when
On Wed, 8 May 2024 13:30:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> As seen in [JDK-8331541](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331541), if we
> are not consistently setting all assembler directives correctly, we can get
> errors that are not detected by the linker.
>
> We should stop duplicating t
> As seen in [JDK-8331541](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331541), if we
> are not consistently setting all assembler directives correctly, we can get
> errors that are not detected by the linker.
>
> We should stop duplicating this code and create a unified macro to properly
> setup func
On 2024-05-16 11:34, Suchismith Roy wrote:
Hi Magnus
Could you provide an existing PR/implementation I can refer from ?
There is no such previous all-encompassing library to just "copy". In
fact, the core problem here is that we are even missing such a place to
put common code.
This is not
On Thu, 23 May 2024 10:27:47 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We should pass a good value for java.io.tmpdir to all java invocations in the
> build, that redirect any temporary files to somewhere under the build
> directory.
>
> This bug was created as a result of the discussion regarding
> [
On Thu, 23 May 2024 06:20:51 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > Further, I confirm that if I pass that option to jlink or jpackage when
> > creating a custom runtime, there is no warning.
>
> Great! What about jpackage without a custom runtime, wondering if
> --java-options can be tested.
Yes, poin
On Thu, 23 May 2024 11:39:18 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> We should pass a good value for java.io.tmpdir to all java invocations in
>> the build, that redirect any temporary files to somewhere under the build
>> directory.
>>
>> This bug was created as a result of the discussion regarding
On Thu, 23 May 2024 03:35:19 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> ### Overview
>>
>> This PR archives `CONSTANT_FieldRef` entries in the _resolved_ state when
>> it's safe to do so.
>>
>> I.e., when a `CONSTANT_FieldRef` constant pool entry in class `A` refers to
>> a *non-static* field `B.F`,
>> - `B` is
> We should pass a good value for java.io.tmpdir to all java invocations in the
> build, that redirect any temporary files to somewhere under the build
> directory.
>
> This bug was created as a result of the discussion regarding
> [JDK-8331348](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331348).
Ma
On Thu, 23 May 2024 10:27:47 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We should pass a good value for java.io.tmpdir to all java invocations in the
> build, that redirect any temporary files to somewhere under the build
> directory.
>
> This bug was created as a result of the discussion regarding
> [
We should pass a good value for java.io.tmpdir to all java invocations in the
build, that redirect any temporary files to somewhere under the build directory.
This bug was created as a result of the discussion regarding
[JDK-8331348](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8331348).
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
