On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:23:04 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
> This fix recovers XDH performance but removes some of the P256 gains
> (~-8-14%). Still faster, but not as much.
>
> The fix is to undo 'int' return type on mult()/square(), which allowed to
> return partially reduced result (i.e.
This fix recovers XDH performance but removes some of the P256 gains (~-8-14%).
Still faster, but not as much.
The fix is to undo 'int' return type on mult()/square(), which allowed to
return partially reduced result (i.e. this avoids extra reductions when mult()
result is fed into addition). T
On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:00:21 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This patch contains a set of changes to improve static builds. They will pave
> the way for implementing a full static-only java launcher. The changes here
> will:
>
> 1) Make sure non-exported symbols are made local in the static l
On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:00:21 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This patch contains a set of changes to improve static builds. They will pave
> the way for implementing a full static-only java launcher. The changes here
> will:
>
> 1) Make sure non-exported symbols are made local in the static l
This patch contains a set of changes to improve static builds. They will pave
the way for implementing a full static-only java launcher. The changes here
will:
1) Make sure non-exported symbols are made local in the static libraries. This
means that the risk of symbol conflict is the same for s
On Thu, 2 May 2024 09:48:51 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using `jtreg` **7.4**.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `requiredV
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:52:40 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Ah, I had not realized that there was more than 1 newline. GitHub's UI
>> confused me here, so we're good to go
>
> GitHub's UI assumes the final line has an line break. If it is missing, it
> displays a red 🚫 at the end of the last
> We have added these long time ago with
> [JDK-8308086](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308086) and
> [JDK-8293165](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293165) to stabilize
> x86_32 sysroot a bit. We never backported those below JDK 21.
Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:34:45 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> I find the extra trailing newlines through below shell command:
>>
>> for i in `find . -iname "Makefile*" | sed "/./build/d"` ; do tail -n 2 $i |
>> grep -c "^$" | grep -q "^1$" ; if [[ 0 -eq $? ]] ; then echo $i ; fi ; done
>>
>>
>> Th
On Thu, 2 May 2024 09:48:51 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using `jtreg` **7.4**.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `requiredV
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:28:37 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> We have added these long time ago with
> [JDK-8308086](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308086) and
> [JDK-8293165](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293165) to stabilize
> x86_32 sysroot a bit. We never backported those below
Please review the change to update to using `jtreg` **7.4**.
The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In addition,
the `requiredVersion` has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` files.
Testing:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:49:34 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Yes, on my list.
Thanks!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2167591811
13 matches
Mail list logo
